Links for Learning Foreign Languages
- Best Language Learning Software Reviews and More
Take your language skills to the next level, for work, travel, study, or pleasure. We'll help you choose the Best Language Learning Software to do so.
- Critical Language Scholarship Program
A program of the U.S. Department of State, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, the Critical Language Scholarship (CLS) Program offers intensive summer language institutes in thirteen critical foreign languages.
Scholarships to Study "Critical Languages"
The US Department of State is giving out scholarships to students to study what, in their opinion, are the best languages to learn. They have chosen 13 languages which are deemed crucial to U.S. national security and economic competitiveness.
The list is as follows:
While some are perfectly understandable, others are curious, to say the least. Let's go down the list, shall we?
- Arabic: This is understandable because of terrorism, and there is a shortage of Arabic speakers that the US Government and intelligence agencies can draw upon.
- Azerbaijani: What? The only reason I can think of is the gas pipelines that are now going through Central Asia, trying to bypass both Iran and Russia to friendly states, that recently had dubious "democratic coloured revolutions".
- Bangla: Again, WTF? Bangladesh is a poor country with few ties to the US as far as I am aware. Maybe it is the terrorism angle since it is a Muslim country?
- Chinese: OK. That is expected. It is expected to be the world's largest economy soon, and it holds the most US debt, while also being a major target for US investors, and the major source of US imports (sometimes from companies owned by the same US investors!).
- Hindi: Not surprising. It is a BRIC country (Brazil, Russia, India, China), with over 1 billion people, the world's largest democracy, a nuclear power, relatively peaceful, a lot of call centres and US links (two US Governors currently are Indian-born, even). OK, fine.
- Korean: Not surprising at all. Long ties with the US since the Korean war and South Korea is a booming, solid, high-tech economy. North Korea, on the other hand, is a crazy country where lots of intelligence is needed. The US has a strong military presence there, etc. OK, understandable.
- Indonesian: Hmmmm. It is the largest Muslim country in the world and has a fairly robust economy. But is it so crucial to US interests?
- Japanese: Definitely. Japan is one of the largest economies in the world, and it is significantly tied to China as well as a major investor. In fact, a lot of what we might consider as Chinese companies are really Japanese owned.
- Persian: Iran is seen as a major antagonist against the US, so that is understandable.
- Punjabi: Really? Punjab is not even a country. It is spoken in Northwestern India, and also in Pakistan. I guess the terrorism aspect is the angle?
- Russian: Sure. It is a BRIC country, and the US still has some lingering antagonism toward it ever since the 19th century.
- Turkish: Interesting. It is a large economy, NATO member, moderate Muslim country, a democracy, and once was the centre of the Muslim world. OK, I get it.
- Urdu: Pakistan again? More spies and intelligence agents, I suppose. Al-Qaeda is still big there, I suppose.
What About the Languages That Are NOT Included?
What is most interesting about the list is what is left out. Portuguese is not there. What about Brazil? Isn't the Brazilian economy one of the world's major ones? And how many people know that there are more Portuguese speakers in Latin America than Spanish speakers?
No European languages are included either. I would think German would be strategic, as the economic core of the European Union. Even French, as the diplomatic and cultural centre of Europe. These places also have large, potentially radical Muslim populations. (I await the criticisms...)
Well, in any case, one wonders how bureaucrats come up with these ideas sometimes. I may be an idiot, I suppose. But I really do question their list.
peasant on April 08, 2018:
The reason the government doesn't want Spanish or German is because we already have a lot of people who speak those here (the second due to cold war deployments). This is stated on th Strategic Language List and I had been personally told so by a US Major who is serving as an attaché abroad.
Latin America has also always been getting a "sideline" treatment. The frontiers of our defensive line are Eastern Europe and The far east, Latin America is seen as our own backyard (and not much indicates they're going to progress into a real threat- although our adversaries are making investments there and they could be valuable allies).
You also point out a few languages like Indonesian and Punjabi as seemingly unimportant. Not only is there a lack in speakers, but these are areas vital to keeping the Chinese in check.
Turkey isn't considered free by the freedom house index and is sort of an "inbetweener". It joined NATO in order to deter the Soviets but with world politics shifting their relationship with the West is deteriorating (plus we need people who are able to communicate with allies).
Ad for languages like French, France can check the terror there. Diplomatically, Europe is now English based.
Abdul on October 02, 2017:
Azerbaijan, turkish, uzbek, krygiz, kazakh, tatar and some others are similar structured.
Mare Turbulentum on November 07, 2013:
The principal danger for USA is his neighbour from the south, Mexico, because Mexico plans to invade all USA in the future, and there are a lot of mexicans who go to USA every year. It is an invasion. They must to learn principally, Spanish.
The languages of the future are: Spanish, Portugues, Russian, Arabic, Chinese, Japanese, Hindi, Urdu, Turkish and French.
Anita Rai (author) on August 19, 2013:
I have recently read some pieces comparing and contrasting the status of women in Turkey, Azerbaijan, and Iran, and the historical connections and divergences are fascinating.
Anita Rai (author) on August 19, 2013:
@Rafiq, I think you should be able to get a great job in the US State Department then! And rise to a pretty high level!
Anita Rai (author) on August 19, 2013:
@trenton rich I actually wrote an article looking at the political neutrality of Esperanto here: http://www.squidoo.com/politics-and-the-english-la...
I am somewhat sceptical about the more extreme claims about the neutrality of Esperanto, but I do find it an interesting phenomenon.
trenton rich on August 18, 2013:
I think we, as well as other countries, should be learning Esperanto as a neutral language.
Rafiq on August 12, 2013:
Lol , I can speak 6 of those and write in 4 and actually make sense of one.
Burak Bilgin from Genk, Belgium on July 21, 2013:
I agree with the comments that probably the US Government has a shortage of employees who speak these languages. Therefore, people who speak one of these languages will probably have higher chances to find a job in the US Government.
Here is a tip if you have difficulties to decide on one of them: if you speak Turkish, you can understand Azerbaijani to a certain extent.
KKX on July 16, 2013:
US need not give scholarship to French and German learners since these languages are popular languages and possibly a couple millions of Americans know these. Portuguese probably is too, or maybe because Portuguese is "mutually intelligible" to Spanish, which is has abundant speakers in the US.
Me on June 23, 2013:
Hmmm... Some of these languages I really question on this list...
Anita Rai (author) on May 21, 2013:
@Brittany, thanks for your comments and sharing your experience.
I understand what you are saying, but my question is more like: if you are dealing with terrorism, why Bangla over Pushto (the ethnic/tribal base of the Taliban), for example? Why is Somali not there?
And if you are dealing with the economic future, Portuguese should be there because of Brazil. I may be wrong, but my impression is that there are not many Americans studying Portuguese as a foreign language.
So I am kind of nitpicking, really. It is the particular choices that have me puzzled. I believe there are other more important lesser-known languages that are better for economics and security.
Brittany on May 21, 2013:
The reason many of the European languages were left out is because there are already a plethora of United States citizens who speak those languages fluently or currently study them. The list is comprised of languages in which there is a deficit of individuals that the government can use for security, intelligence, and communication purposes. I know from personal experience working on government language contracts that it is very difficult to get good tranlators or interpreters for those languages that are also capable of obtaining a government security clearance.
Lindsey on May 08, 2013:
I agree with you on Portuguese, I would think that would be an important one given the Brazilian economy as well. Most German speakers speak such good English (better than many native speakers!) that it probably doesn't make a lot of sense for us to focus on that language. Our time is probably better spent on languages of regions where English is not as widely spoken.
mikielikie from Texas on May 05, 2013:
Anita Rai (author) on May 04, 2013:
@Paul Kuehn, your insights are much appreciated. I knew I would be "stepping in it" once I gave my opinion, because of course the people in the US State Department aren't dummies (even if one may disagree with particular judgements from time to time). I do find it surprising that these are the top 13 languages identified. It might be also that the existing numbers are low, and there is a critical need to expand the amount of Americans who can speak those languages.
Vinaya Ghimire from Nepal on May 04, 2013:
This is quite an interesting hub. I was not aware about this condition. Maybe I should try to make my Hindi better. LOL
Paul Richard Kuehn from Udorn City, Thailand on May 04, 2013:
I find this list very interesting due to my past experience working for the State Department. I agree that all of the languages included on the State Department list are the best languages to learn in the interests of the U.S. government. Arabic, Punjabi, Urdu, Indonesian/Malaysian, and even Dari have been on the government's list since at least 2001 and that's because of terrorism and Al Quedda. In talking about Chinese, we are referring to Chinese Mandarin, the national language. It wouldn't be surprising if the study of the Cantonese and Minnan (Hokkien) dialects are also included. When I started learning Chinese in the late 60s with the Navy, the study of Portuguese, German, and Vietnamese was encouraged by the government. Voted up and sharing.