5 Chinese Emperors Who Ended Their Reigns as Captives
1. Liu Shan (刘禅), Last Emperor of Shu Han, AD 207–271
Be offended if you are called an “Ah Dou” (阿斗) by a Chinese person. Be very offended! The childhood name of Liu Shan, the orphaned son of Three Kingdoms Warlord Liu Bei, is nowadays synonymous with a good-for-nothing successor who fails despite intensive mentoring. It can also mean "moron" or "imbecile."
Historically, Liu Shan was the second and last emperor of Shu Han and reigned from AD 223 to AD 263. After Shu Han surrendered to Cao Wei in AD 263, Liu Shan was relocated to the Wei capital of Luoyang and conferred the honorary title of Duke Anle (安乐, the Chinese term for contentment). There, he remained until his death in AD 271. Notably, Liu Shan was not ill-treated during captivity. Neither was he forced to live under humiliating circumstances. His final days were relatively comfortable.
Of all the captive Chinese emperors on this list, Liu Shan got off the easiest. However, he is not spared the disdain of subsequent generations. This is due in large part to how accounts of the Three Kingdoms era inevitably portray him as stupid and incapable—a hopeless fool that even legendary statesman Zhuge Liang could not mentor. There was also a particularly damaging incident involving a banquet hosted by Wei Regent Sima Zhao after Liu Shan’s surrender. During this event, Shu's music was intentionally performed. While Liu Shan’s retainers wept for their lost empire, Liu Shan himself was indifferent. He even coolly remarked that he no longer thought about Shu. In his words, his blissful life in Cao Wei was more than enough for him.
Today, some historians defend Liu Shan, arguing that his statement was, in reality, a shrewd way of avoiding execution by Cao Wei. Other portrayals depict him as intelligent and deeply resentful of Zhuge Liang’s constant supervision, also claiming he actively sought to remove the latter from office. Whatever the truth, Ah Dou still goes down in Chinese history as the worst sort of son a man could have. To the Chinese, Liu Shan also represents the worst type of ruler any empire could suffer. He is scorned as a coward who agreed to bow to the enemy rather than die in dignity.
2. Sima Chi (司馬炽), Fourth Emperor of Western Jin, AD 284–313
The Jin Dynasty, which succeeded the tumultuous Three Kingdoms era, started off promisingly. After 60 years of bloody civil war, China was whole again, once more united under one rule. However, it didn't take long for the Middle Kingdom to once again descend into turmoil, beginning with the devastating War of the Eight Princes, before suffering invasion by neighbouring Xiongnu (匈奴, barbarian) states. By the time Sima Chi ascended the throne, the Jin Dynasty was broken, corrupt, and ineffective. The imperial court was also under the iron grip of Sima Yue, one of the princes in the previous civil conflict. Sima Chi, emperor in name only, wielded almost no power.
Today, many historians consider Sima Chi, or Jin Huaidi (晋怀帝), as well-meaning and intelligent but ultimately doomed. The hapless emperor had neither political power nor military might to deal with Sima Yue or the barbarian invasions. In fact, he couldn’t even protect himself, for soon after Sima Yue’s death, he was captured by the Xiongnu state of Han Zhao. Initially, the disposed emperor was treated reasonably. However, in AD 313, he met his demise when he was falsely accused of treason and brutally poisoned to death.
In a tragic repeat of Sima Chi’s fate, his successor Sima Ye would also be captured by Han Zhao in AD 316. Like his uncle, Sima Ye was forced to serve wine as a butler. Thereafter, he was condemned to death and swiftly executed.
Western Jin vs. Eastern Jin
Chinese historians divide the Jin Dynasty into Western Jin and Eastern Jin. Simply put, Western Jin was the empire from its establishment until Sima Ye's capture. Eastern Jin was the remnant after the dynasty was forced by barbarian invasions to retreat to the east.
3. Li Yu (李煜), Last Emperor of Southern Tang, AD 938–978
First off, Southern Tang is not the famed Tang Dynasty of Chang’an and Silk Route fame. After the original Tang Dynasty ended, China was split into numerous short-lived feuding states, with Southern Tang being one of the final ones. The founder, Li Bian, probably sought to legitimise his rule by adopting the dynastic title of the famous former Chinese emperors. (Li was also the family surname of the Tang dynasty.) At its peak, Southern Tang controlled substantial land in the heart of China. It was considered one of the larger, stronger kingdoms in this war-torn, Ten Kingdoms era.
By Li Yu’s reign, however, Southern Tang was under severe threat from the armies of Zhao Kuangyin in the north. The latter had established the Song Dynasty, and before long, Southern Tang was reduced to no more than a mere vassal state. Eventually, Li Yu was forced to formally surrender to Zhao in AD 975, and thereafter, kept under house arrest in Kaifeng. There, Li Yu and his family would languish for three years. The captive emperor ultimately died from poisoning by the Second Song Emperor, Zhao Guangyi, in AD 978.
Of note, Li Yu is both hailed as one of China’s most artistically talented emperors and condemned as an ineffectual ruler who first overindulged in the arts, then sought to appease the Zhao family through constant land concessions. A more objective way of assessing him would be to say that Li Yu was more of an artist than a ruler, and therefore, had no chance of victory against the military and management brilliance of Zhao Kuangyin. In his final years, Li Yu himself acknowledged his own shortcomings and lamented about them in several poignant poems. The most famous of these are nowadays regarded as gems of medieval Chinese literature. They have also inspired numerous Chinese operas, historical films, and television shows.
A Tragic Sovereign?
Li Yu is commonly referred to as Li Houzhu and is immortalised in a Cantonese opera work of the same name. Within the opera, he is portrayed as a well-meaning and suffering sovereign. In turn, this portrayal has, over the years, generated much sympathy for him among Cantonese opera fans.
4. Zhao Ji (赵佶), Eighth Emperor of Northern Song, AD 1082–1135
Commonly referred to as Emperor Huizong of Northern Song, Zhao Ji, like Li Yu (see above), was an accomplished painter, poet, and calligrapher. So legendary were his skills he even had a style of Chinese calligraphy named after him. On the other hand, he was terrible as a ruler, constantly overemphasising the arts and Taoism while making numerous diplomatic mistakes. During his reign, Northern Song was under severe threat of invasion by the Northern Jurchens, but Zhao Ji and his ministers did little to contain the threat. Their negligence finally invited an all-out invasion by the Jurchens in AD 1126.
In the face of disaster, Zhao Ji did the ridiculous. He abdicated and passed the throne to his eldest son, Zhao Huan, an act that neither saved his empire nor himself. Instead, when Song Capital Bianjing fell the next year, both Zhao Ji and his son were taken captive. The two emperors then spent the rest of their lives as prisoners of the Jurchens. Zhao Ji himself died eight years later. Before his death, he suffered multiple humiliations at the hands of the Jurchens. These include a demotion to the status of a commoner, being forced to honour Jurchen ancestors, and being conferred the derogatory title of Besotted Duke.
5. Zhao Huan (赵桓), Ninth Emperor of Northern Song, AD 1100–1161
Whenever a reign ends with captivity in Chinese history, the emperor would be assumed to be inept. In other words, deserving of his fate. Personally, I would say this was not the case for Zhao Huan, otherwise known as Emperor Qinzong of Northern Song. His father, Zhao Ji (see above) forced the throne on him when he was 26 years old. By then, the Jurchens had invaded, and by most accounts, were plain unstoppable. If anything, young Zhao Huan’s only mistake was focusing on negotiations rather than putting up a strong resistance. In AD 1127, his capital was overrun and Zhao Huan taken captive together with his father. He would spend the rest of his life broken and humiliated, a captive of the Jurchens, till his death in AD 1161.
The capture of Zhao Huan and his father is historically referred to as the Jingkang Incident (靖康之恥) and is considered to be one of the most humiliating episodes in Chinese history. It also ended what is now called the Northern Song Dynasty, with the remaining Chinese forces relinquishing Northern China and relocating their capital to the southern city of Lin’an. Chinese periodic stories such as Wuxia are fond of referencing this incident, and a common trope is the quest to rescue the two captive emperors. Sadly, the truth was that the first emperor of the Southern Song dynasty was more than happy to leave the two captive Chinese emperors in Jurchen hands. Historians mostly agree that the first Southern Song emperor, Gaozong, dreaded having to relinquish the throne in the event of Zhao Huan being rescued. This doomed poor Zhao Huan, resulting in him spending more than half his life in captivity.
Questions & Answers
© 2016 Kuan Leong Yong