On Mark Twain's Critique of the Book of Mormon
Mark Twain (a.k.a Samuel Clemons) the Satirist
The father of American literature, of course, would have an opinion on the Book of Mormon: Another Testament of Jesus Christ since it claims a uniquely American origin. Who better to take to task the "Mormon Bible?"
As much as this article is about my estimation of the opinion of Mark Twain regarding a book of great significance in my life as a true believing member of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, it is also a cautionary tale. The brilliance of a person such as Mark Twain does not equate to any level of other-worldly understanding. Mark Twain is prominent for his writings, but that is not how I know him. As with many American children, Disney movies, and book assigned readings in school classes introduced me to Twain's stories. Interestingly, it is not his stories that helped me feel like I know him.
I know about him due to his inclusion as a character in other fictions, fantasies woven together using his presence out of time to lend to the illusion of credibility. It worked in my case because he has since become an icon of literature personally. I love and respect his place in history as the Charles Dickens of America!
Mark Twain is the persona chosen by Samuel Clemons to disseminate his satirical brand of reporting to the world. In honor of his preference, I will refer to him by his pseudonym.
Twain enjoyed reporting with satire. Satire is defined as the use of humor, irony, exaggeration, or ridicule to expose and criticize differences, ineptitude, or vices of a subject (person or organization) in the context of contemporary culture and politics.
The important feature of this brand of writing is that the author compares the differences of the topic group from the majority group culturally or religiously, in this instance, to exaggerate and ridicule how foreign those differences are from commonly practiced and believed dogma.
Satire is a gross misrepresentation of the facts. Sensationalism in regard to Twain's estimation of the Book of Mormon may not so chiefly apply so generously. Of course, I will write that Twain was not a fair observer. His purpose is sensationalism to sell books! He was not a news reporter. Me, as an admirer of Twain's as the icon in American literature he is and a true believer, has to reconcile what the old man wrote about a piece of written sacrament of my faith in the hopes to exculpate Joseph Smith, Jr of disparaging sentiments at least and expose the error of Twain at the most.
Mark Twain's assessment of the Book of Mormon was not flattering... Was he using a gross exaggeration of what he read or was he for once being direct in his estimation?
Twain's Book of Mormon (Possibly)
Twain's Estimation of the Book of Mormon
Twain did not have a copy of the book as we see it printed today. There is no subtitle explaining that it is another witness of the sonship of Jesus Christ of God. It was most likely in appearance as the image above of a dark leather-bound book.
After an assessment of the Book of Mormon, Twain provided that
The book seems to be merely a prosy detail of imaginary history, with the Old Testament for a model; followed by a tedious plagiarism of the New Testament. The author labored to give his words and phrases the quaint, old-fashioned sound and structure of our King James’s translation of the Scriptures; and the result is a mongrel—half modern glibness, and half ancient simplicity and gravity. The latter is awkward and constrained; the former natural, but grotesque by the contrast. Whenever he found his speech growing too modern—which was about every sentence or two—he ladled in a few such Scriptural phrases as “exceeding sore,” “and it came to pass,” etc., and made things satisfactory again. “And it came to pass” was his pet. If he had left that out, his Bible would have been only a pamphlet. I, Nephi Mormonism and its meanings.By Adam Gopnik
Mark Twain's assessment of the Book of Mormon was not flattering. His estimation of the Latter-day Saints as a group was not negative, per se. He did not even declare the book a fakery in the pure sense of the word. Was he using a gross exaggeration of what he read or was he for once being direct in his estimation?
The Book of Mormon Musical is a modern satire of the record. It does not necessarily state things about the book that are untrue, but it does offer exaggerated takes on the Latter-day Saint culture and religious practices.
The Book of Mormon Musical
Some people have to have a world of evidence before they can come anywhere in the neighborhood of believing anything; but for me... I am very far on the road to conviction
A Prosy Detail of Imaginary History
A claim that many opposers of the Latter-day Saint scriptures have made for nearly two centuries. Apparently, Twain believed that the book was fiction--made up history written in story form. As a writer, Twain has written enough fiction to know fiction when he reads it, right? Honestly, no. That is what he called it. From what he could tell, it was modeled after the old testament so that it can appear historically based.
He was looking for an angle from which Joseph Smith, Jr. looked to enterprise on his people; however, he had to reconcile that by the time he met the Latter-day Saints, Joseph was dead. Was Joseph trying to create a spiritual legacy for himself?
Twain is not alone in this estimation. Even some faithful members of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints claim that the book is no more than inspired allegory. According to this understanding, the principles in the book are the true principle of Christianity and the stories or history are no more than containers to deliver the messages.
He never claimed that the book was false. Seemed. He said it seemed like the prosy detail of imaginary history. It seemed false because it was new and familiar at the same time. When Twain read the introduction to the Book of Mormon, particularly the witnesses of the book at the beginning he recorded in his book,
Some people have to have a world of evidence before they can come anywhere in the neighborhood of believing anything; but for me, when a man tells me that he has "seen the engravings which are upon the plates," and not only that, but an angel was there at the time, and saw him see them, and probably took his receipt for it, I am very far on the road to conviction, no matter whether I ever heard of that man before or not, and even if I do not know the name of the angel, or his nationality either. Roughing It – Chapter 16
Mark Twain was a celebrity. This does not discount his opinion, but it puts it into perspective. Twain had a grasp of American language to turn a phrase in English, but he did not have the expertise to determine what made or did not make holy scripture. Also, he never claimed to put the book to the test and ask God if it was what it claims to be, the word of God.
My contention is that Mark Twain was inclined to believe the Book of Mormon based on the witnesses of the existence of the plates from which the book was translated alone.
Joseph Smith, Jr. Translating the Gold Plates into the Book of Mormon
Religion is under fire in society as a new generation of people seeks answers to life's questions in other places. Taking the view that Twain took by dismissing the importance of the religious notions of Latter-day Saints, today's seekers may find answers in the very books and faith that seem tedious to a casual perusing if a thorough investigation followed instead. More On Mark Twain's Critique of the Book of Mormon [https://hubpages.com/religion-philosophy/On-Mark-Twains-Critique-of-the-Book-of-Mormon-2] provides concluding remarks about Twain's perspective from a modern reader of the Book of Mormon.
This content is accurate and true to the best of the author’s knowledge and is not meant to substitute for formal and individualized advice from a qualified professional.
Questions & Answers
© 2018 Rodric Anthony