The Philosophy of Consciousness

Updated on April 3, 2019
Rupert Taylor profile image

I've spent half a century (yikes) writing for radio and print—mostly print. I hope to be still tapping the keys as I take my last breath.

The Book of Philosophy tells us “Philosophy is not so much about coming up with the answers to fundamental questions as it is about the process of trying to find these answers using reasoning rather than accepting without question conventional views or traditional authority.”

The Philosophers’ Mail echoes that thought: “Is it really true what people say about love, about money, about children, about travel, about work? Philosophers are interested in asking whether an idea is logical – rather than simply assuming it must be right because it is popular and long-established.”


Let the Debate Begin

One of the ways in which philosophers try to find answers to questions is to argue. This is not argument in the fashion of “reality” television in which people yell at each other and resolve nothing. Philosophical argument is of a quieter, more dignified nature.

One of their many points of disagreement is on the nature of consciousness. It doesn’t help in unravelling this story when The Atlantic magazine carries an article on the topic under the title “Most Popular Theories of Consciousness Are Worse than Wrong.”

Fortunately, Australian philosopher David Chalmers has come to the rescue – a bit. In a 1994 paper, Dr. Chalmers divided the problem of consciousness into two parts, easy and hard.

Brain Physiology

The easy part is to study the brain where consciousness clearly lives, perhaps. Scientists can study brain functions and explain them in chemical and electrical terms. They can identify which parts of the brain are connected to feelings of happiness or which area is used to recognize faces. They can also point to the part that suggests placing the mortgage money on Hoof Hearted in the fifth at Belmont is not a good plan.

Some scientists argue that consciousness is a function of brain size. A human has a more heightened sense of consciousness than, say, a mouse. The human brain contains about 86 billion nerve cells, while a mouse has to get along with just 75 million. So, the mouse lacks the computing power to handle complex thought.

For some philosophers this is enough; this is the physical explanation of consciousness.

Kristian Marlow (Psychology Today, March 2013) says the appeal of this theory is that it’s simple. He adds that “it gives us a really good reason to think that computers can become conscious.” If brains are simply computers made of meat “it’s possible that a silicon chip could run the same software as us.”


Insoluble Problem?

The other view of consciousness, the hard part, is why and how an arrangement of brain cells brings about consciousness. And, Kristian Marlow says this mystery “may never be solved.”

He adds that there are two arguments about why this may always be unknowable: “The first argument is that our puny brains aren’t capable of coming up with a solution … The second argument is that a solution to a problem requires that you aren’t a part of the problem.” What does this mean?

Solving problems requires the ability to step back and view the issue globally, from afar. But, because we are part of the big picture we can’t do that. As Mr. Marlow puts it “We simply cannot solve the hard problem because we don’t have access to the level of information necessary to piece everything together.” We can't see it in its entirety because we are in it.


The accepted theory of the origin of the Universe is that it started with the Big Bang and that it was filled with matter such as hydrogen and other elements. This matter was without intelligence. The next step is that unseen forces such as gravity and electromagnetism created everything we can observe and study.

But, Dr. Robert Lanza (professor of biology at Wake Forest University) asks how human consciousness came out of this “stupid stuff.” He says we have been looking at the Universe upside down.

Here’s Paul Kennedy of the Canadian Broadcasting Corporations radio show Ideas: Dr. Lanza “takes the common assumption that the Universe led to the creation of life and argues that it’s the other way around: that life is not a by-product of the Universe, but its very source.

“Or, put another way, consciousness is what gives rise to our sense of there being an ‘out there’ when, in fact, the world we experience around us is actually created in our consciousness.”

His biocentrism idea says that consciousness exists outside the human body we think it inhabits. That means that consciousness does not die when the physical body dies. So, what happens to it? This is where Dr. Lanza introduces us to multiple universes. He says a body might be dead in one universe but the consciousness is alive and well in another universe to which it has migrated.

This is certainly revolutionary thinking but before it’s dismissed as crackpot theory it has to be noted that plenty of physicists and astrophysicists say multiple universes are quite possible.


Universal Mind

A very old theory says that we don’t have individual consciousness but our minds are part of a collective consciousness. Certain strains of Buddhism believe in the idea, as well as ancient Chinese and Greek philosophy.

Tania Kotsos promotes the concept in books and seminars. She writes that the universal mind “is all knowing, all powerful, all creative and always present. As it is present everywhere at the same time, it follows that it must also be present in you - that it is you.”

She leans on Albert Einstein for support. He noted that “everything is energy” and that “a human being is a part of the whole called by us [the] Universe.”

The theory holds the promise of a form of immortality; after death the individual mind merges with the collective conscious. However, it’s a theory that cannot be proved, nor can it be disproved.


Bonus Factoids

According to the British Broadcasting Corporation the French philosopher René Descartes had a theory that monkeys and apes were able to talk – but kept quiet in case they were asked to do any work.

The British philosopher Bertrand Russell made the joke that “The point of philosophy is to start with something so simple as to not seem worth stating, and to end with something so paradoxical that no one will believe it.”


  • “Most Popular Theories of Consciousness Are Worse Than Wrong.” Michael Graziano, The Atlantic, March 9, 2016.
  • “How do you Explain Consciousness?” David Chalmers, TED, March 2014.
  • “What is Consciousness?” Kristian Marlow, Psychology Today, March 1, 2013.
  • “Biocentrism: Rethinking Time, Space, Consciousness, and the Illusion of Death.” CBC Ideas, October 4, 2016.
  • “Immortality.” The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
  • “You are One With the Universal Mind.” Tania Kotsos, Mind Your Reality, undated.

© 2017 Rupert Taylor


    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment
    • profile image


      3 months ago

      Has dementia anything to teach us , the gradual lessening of cognitive mind ?

    • Rupert Taylor profile imageAUTHOR

      Rupert Taylor 

      7 months ago from Waterloo, Ontario, Canada

      Hi Jason. I have no opinion about the Mandela Effect because I know very little about it other than that it has something to do with false memories. I'll look into it more; it might be worth an article. Stay tuned.

    • TheShadowSpecter profile image

      Jason B Truth 

      7 months ago from United States of America

      Rupert Taylor? Your article delves into much of the academic take on consciousness, and it is well-written. However, because you brought up the subject of parallel universes in their relationship with consciousness therein, I'd be interested in knowing what your viewpoint is on the so-called "Mandela Effect." A lot of people seem to be talking about it all over the Internet.

    • profile image


      8 months ago

      This article is the opposite of what philosophy should be - rather than presenting a view and arguing for it, this article uses established philosophy to try to give an outlandish idea intellectual weight. This is not the method of philosophy - it is the method of pop philosophy.

    • profile image

      Parthasarathi Bhattachary 

      9 months ago

      Mind is not in a position to delve onto the realm of beyond- mind. Consciousness is not a product of mind, it is apparently a process of being in mind. So the mind gets dissolved in ascertaining and affirming the syntax of consciousness.

      Being in something to being in consciousness is a wide trajectory, like a flow of streaming canvases. Imagination and reasoning are entwined together...hence consciousness eludes a definite resolution.

    • profile image

      Brent Allsop 

      10 months ago

      There is an emerging expert consensus over at which, if verified by science will reveal how to bridge the explanatory gap, or “eff the ineffable” which is the essence of the hard problem. The name of this theory is being called: “Representational Qualia Theory”. ( ) Any expert can “canonize” or support any theory they think best, but so far, only “Representational Qualia Theory” has managed any significant amount of expert consensus.

    • profile image


      14 months ago

      this information about parts that are about easy and hard is remarkable


    This website uses cookies

    As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

    For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at:

    Show Details
    HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
    LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
    Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
    AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
    Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
    CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the or domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
    Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
    Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
    Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
    Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
    ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)
    ClickscoThis is a data management platform studying reader behavior (Privacy Policy)