The Toledo War Between Michigan and Ohio

Updated on May 5, 2018
Jule Romans profile image

Jule Romans is a retired English teacher and college instructor. She has taught Shakespeare and advanced literature for over 25 years.

A historical marker commemorates the conflict.
A historical marker commemorates the conflict. | Source

Human error is a remarkable catalyst. It can ignite tragedy, even war. It can also instigate events so foolish, yet so seriously regarded by participants, that war itself becomes a comedy.

Of course, war is nothing to laugh at, especially in our present circumstances. Real war carries with it great heartbreak and suffering.Somehow, though, tragedy and comedy seem always to have lived side by side in our common human experience.

Michigan and Ohio

So it was for the earliest humans to inhabit the rich and varied lands of southeastern Michigan. So it is for us today, as we grapple with the tragedy of today’s real and difficult struggles.

So it was, also, for the settlers engaged in a struggle over the Ohio-Michigan border in the early 19th century.

A Comic Series of Skirmishes

The Toledo War comprised a comic series of skirmishes between Ohio and Michigan in April, July, and September of 1835. The events of that summer were caused by human error, and exacerbated by foolish pride. They play out like a comedy performed in the theater of war, existing in sharp contrast to a real, tragic war with its devastating consequences.

The battles, in reality, carried little more than inconvenience to a potato and the short-lived bruises of a bar brawl. In homes, swamps, gardens, taverns and schoolhouses, human folly ruled the day (and night). When it was over, politics won.

An Ongoing Conflict

Ohio retained the disputed territory. Michigan was granted consolation property much farther north. The active conflict faded, but political controversy continued for over a century, with human error and pride joining in to provide amusing results.

The Toledo Strip
The Toledo Strip | Source

Simple Geography?

We might begin by imagining a man drawing a map.

In 1755, such a task would not be easy. Travel would be difficult, treacherous, and lonely. Even the best mapping tools then in use would probably seem even less than rudimentary to today’s cartographers. It must have been like attempting to create a multi-graphic, hyperlinked website using only slate and chalk.

Dr. John Mitchell's Map, 1755

Nonetheless, Dr. John Mitchell created a fine map that included the Great Lakes. In it, he described a line running from the southern tip of Lake Michigan due west to Lake Erie. With all the challenges of this assignment, is it so surprising that his placement of Lake Michigan was incorrect?

Writing for the Toledo Sequicentennial commission, Tana Mosier Porter notes that Mitchell somehow placed its southern tip 40 miles farther north than is should have been (23).

The Northwest Ordinance

Mitchell's map was used as the basis for the calculations and descriptions for the Northwest Ordinance. Thus, the boundary used by the Northwest Ordinance fell north of the Maumee River (Reimann 1952).


Dr. Mitchell's line.
Dr. Mitchell's line. | Source

The error was discovered in 1802, when it was demonstrated that a due west line from the tip of Lake Michigan would actually intersect Lake Erie south of the Maumee River.


The error is noted.
The error is noted. | Source

Fulton and Harris

Around 1816, surveyors Fulton and Harris each solved this problem using different calculations.

Fulton’s line used the tip of Lake Michigan in its correct location. (Gilpin 1970). Harris’s line used the point on Lake Erie that, when extended, would reach Lake Michigan farther north (Gilpin 1970).

One might say that Fulton moved the lake, while Harris moved the line.

Though the two lines did not meet, a midpoint was created, and they were joined by a small north/south jog, or possibly even an angled line (Gilpin 1970). The line between the lakes began north on Lake Michigan but ended south on Lake Erie.

William Harris surveyed the line.
William Harris surveyed the line. | Source

An Attempt at Compromise

By 1837, the Lake Erie endpoint of Mitchell’s survey was restored, creating a broken and slightly angled line between the two lakes.

The compromise line.
The compromise line. | Source

In the absence of politics, a purely geographic solution could have been simple.

One straight line or another might have been selected.

But geography involves people; and people, as the saying goes, are “rarely pure, and never simple.”

Compromise? No. Conflict? Yes.

The people of Ohio and Michigan elevated geography to the ludicrous. Citizens armed themselves, albeit with brooms and feathers (George 1971). Profanities were uttered, accompanied by knife-wounds (Waggoner 1888). Shots were fired after secret meetings in the dead of night (May).

All this accompanied the problem of Toledo and the Ohio/Michigan boundary. Politics complicated issues, pride clouded judgment, and the “War” was on.

Simply Politics

Dr. Mitchell’s unfortunate error sparked controversy because it was discovered at a politically inopportune time.

Michigan was making its way from Territory to State. Its growth was at a critical point. Ohio gained Statehood (1802) before Michigan even applied (1833), but both claimed the same strip of land.

This “Toledo Strip” was somewhat settled, with rich farmland and access to waterways. The War of 1812 had delayed surveys, giving politicians time to influence surveyors.

Harris (1816) gave Ohio the disputed territory, while Fulton (1818) gave it to Michigan.

Negotiations between Ohio and Michigan failed.

Another survey was ordered.

Before it could be completed, Ohio’s Governor Lucas was pitted against Michigan’s Governor Mason in an escalating contest of wills that took on comic proportions. The year was 1835.

The Battle of Phillips Corners
The Battle of Phillips Corners | Source

April: The Battle of Phillips Corners

Michigan Started It

On February 12th, the Michigan legislature claimed the Fulton Line and passed the “Pains and Penalties” Act. This Act provided severe consequences for anyone who “acted on authority other than that of Michigan” in the Toledo Strip (George 1971).

Ohio responded with legislation of its own. In a session on February 23rd, the Harris line was declared correct, and a party of surveyors appointed to mark it. Michigan viewed this action a violation of the new law.

Both states readied their militia.

Confused Citizens

Citizens were less than clear about their loyalties. “…Both Ohio and Michigan claimed jurisdiction over the settlers in the disputed area, and both tried to tax the confused citizens. Many refused to pay or even abide by the conflicting laws…riots broke out in the area in defiance (Riemann n.p.).”

The Monroe County Sheriff began arresting violators- those who seemed in favor of Ohio. “It has been alleged, or it was at the time, that the residents of the disputed territory were substantially unanimous against Ohio (Waggoner 1888, 295).”

B.F. Stickney Jailed

Whether or not this was the case, the Sheriff’s posse created great distress in the house of Major Benjamin F. Stickney one night. Stickney, his family, George McKay, and a Mr. Goodsell were removed from the home by force and taken to jail in Michigan.

There was much communication back and forth, and many letters addressed to Washington.

Federal agent Benjamin Howard found the situation worsening with “men galloping about- guns getting ready-wagons being filled with people and hurrying off, and everybody in commotion (George 1971, 33).”

The Battle of Phillips Corners

In this atmosphere, the Ohio survey party was ready to go. A clash was inevitable. It came as the group, (accompanied by Ohio commissioners) ran its line to a small field near Adrian, Michigan, then known as Phillips Corners.

The Ohioans had 40 armed men, while Michigan had nearly a thousand.

Under-Sheriff William McNair went forward alone and demanded that the Ohioans surrender. They did not.

Shots Fired, Prisoners Taken

The Posse fired over their heads, at which point almost all of the party fled.

Nine men were taken as prisoners to the Tecumseh jail, where two were released, six entered bail and one was retained (Gilpin 1970).

The gentleman retained was J.E. Fletcher. “He dined with the [Michigan] Governor at General Brown’s, where both urged him to accept bail. His reply was that the right to demand bail, was the one question at issue (Waggoner 1888, 299).”

Escapees

Those who escaped suffered not at all. Under-Sheriff McNair himself was

“Happy to also inform… that the commissioners made good time on foot, through the Cottonwood Swamp, and arrived at Perrysburg the next morning with nothing more serious than loss of hats and clothing, like Governor Marcy’s breeches without the ‘patch.’ (Waggoner 1888, 298)”

The first battle of the Toledo War seemed to have ended amicably for all but the Stickneys. No wounds were sustained by anyone.

In July, because of the Stickneys and George McKay, this was to change.

July: “There Damn You, You Have Got It Now”

B.F. Stickney’s motives were questionable. The Monroe Gazette later reported that Stickney had been a Michiganian when “Taxes on real and personal property were much less in Michigan than Ohio… (George 1971, 35)” But that “He found it more advantageous to his pecuniary concerns, to become an inhabitant of Ohio (George 1971, 35).”

Outrage

Even so, the invasion of his home caused outrage. A witness said,

“We are driven from our homes…our houses broken into in the dead of night…bound hand and foot, tied to fiery horses, gagged that they may not alarm the rest of this citizens. The females too in the same house are treated with violence. And all this for saying to an individual, he need not obey the laws of Michigan.” (George 1971, 35).

When the Ohio flag was dragged through the dust by Michigan soldiers, Stickney himself wrote,

“There cannot be a doubt that the generous Ohioans will turn out en masse to protect their northern border and restrain the savage barbarity of the hordes of the north (Waggoner 1888, 297; George 1971, 36).

Two Stickney

Benjamin Stickney’s son, Two Stickney, lived up to his name. A habitually violent young man, he had participated in several public disturbances.

When Deputy Sheriff Joseph Wood attempted to arrest him on July 15th, 1835, Two Stickney stuck Deputy Wood in the side with a penknife. [See Diagram 1]. Lyman Hurd, Constable of Monroe, was there:

“Mr. Hurd stated that he and Wood went into the hotel of J Baron Davis, where they found Stickney and McKay. Hurd attempted to arrest McKay, when he sprang, caught a chair and told Hurd that unless he desisted he would split him down. Hurd then saw that McKay had a dirk in his hand. At the same time, Wood made the attempt to arrest Stickney, laying his hand on Stickney’s shoulder, when a scuffle ensued, during which Stickney drew a dirk and stabbed Wood in the left side saying ‘there, damn you, you have got it now.’ Wood then let go of Stickney and went out the door, saying he was stabbed (Waggoner 1888, 300).”

Deputy Wood's Demise

Governor Mason was erroneously informed that Deputy Wood had died of his wound (Gilpin 1970).

A doctor who attended Wood said, “The patient was much astonished to learn that he was not mortally injured. (Waggoner 1888, 300).”

Wood eventually recovered, but not before a posse of about two hundred men was formed, and returned to the area.

B.F. Stickney Arrested (Again)

Two’s father, Benjamin Stickney was arrested again, along with George McKay. Two Stickney escaped, and a later request for his extradition was refused on grounds that it was unnecessary- the crime having been committed in OHIO, not Michigan.

Two Stickney
Two Stickney | Source

September: Night Court

If Michigan started it, Ohio finished it.

As events escalated, Governor Mason’s poor judgment became evident, and he was removed from office. Michigan’s lack of leadership led to questionable behavior.

The Court of Common Pleas

The date for Ohio’s Court of Common Pleas session was fast approaching, and Ohio's Governor Lucas did not want any more embarrassing incidents.

Michigan’s sentiments were the opposite.

“WAR! WAR! Orders have been issued for volunteers to rendezvous at Mulholland’s, in the county of Monroe on the 1st of September next, for the purpose of resisting the military encroachments of Ohio (Waggoner 1888, 302).”

It should be noted that it took the Michigan rabble four days to march only a few miles toward Toledo. They camped, caroused, and raided vegetable gardens in the name of their cause. A good deal of drinking took place.

Governor Lucas's Solution: Night Court

Governor Lucas desperately wanted a solution that would give him jurisdiction over the area without coming in contact with Michigan “troops.”

The Ohio men who were to hold court on September 7th were concerned and frightened. “In spite of the fact that the judges were accompanied by a small armed guard, they were half scared out of their wits by fear of Michigan Militiamen (May 255).”

The solution chosen was to hold court in the dead of night- as soon after 12:01 on the 7th as possible.

In the Dead of Night...

The party set out after midnight, and reached their destination between 1:00 and 3:00 a.m.

“In the dead of night they crept into a schoolhouse, blacked out the windows, lit a tallow dip, went through the motions of holding court, and hastily repaired to a nearby tavern to refresh their spirits. (May 255).”

When they heard a rumor that the Michigan men were approaching, they ran off without paying their bill.

The Clerk's Hat

On that ride, the clerk lost his tall hat, in which he had hidden the official court documents. The party had to return, and they did, shaking the entire time they searched.

When they found the hat and papers, they fired shots in the air, and ran back for the border as fast as they could. (Gilpin 1970; George 1971; May) These shots fired were reminiscent of the shots fired in April.

In fact, the Michiganians never reached their destination until the following day, and finding no one present, declared victory by forfeit, then went home.

No one was hurt.

Deputy Wood Injured Again

No one, that is, but poor Deputy Wood, who was wounded a second time.

Presumably, after recovering from the stab would, Wood went back to active duty.

“…There was another incident soon thereafter at Toledo when a Michigan posse sought to arrest the judges who had held the night court. During the melee, Deputy Wood was shot in the arm (Gilpin 1970, 182).”

Deputy Wood was the only man who shed blood for Michigan’s cause. He did so twice…and only after battles in which he wasn’t even a soldier.

The active conflict was essentially over.

Ohio Men Pardoned

The final determination would have to be made on a federal level. In a an attempted act of closure, “Acting Governor Horner went to Monroe and pardoned all the Ohio men heretofore arrested or sought, with the exception of Two Stickney (Gilpin 1970, 182).”

This in itself was somewhat silly as “A Whig newspaper pointed out the absurdity of pardoning men before trial, as they must be presumed innocent before that time (Gilpin 1971, 182).”

Simple Geography? Simply Politics

Ohio finished marking the Harris line in November of 1835. The survey ordered in 1832 was completed in December of 1835.

The Talcott Line

Ironically, that line, the Talcott Line, was ignored. It gave the Toledo Strip, plus some additional footage, to the soon-to-be State of Michigan. However correct Talcott’s work was, the boundary was not to be.

Michigan Statehood

As part of the Statehood process, Michigan was required to give up its quest for the Toledo Strip. This it did reluctantly, ungraciously accepting 9,000 miles of Upper Peninsula land in exchange.

The Harris Line

By 1915, The adjusted Harris line was properly marked, and accepted with ceremony by both states.

Mitchell’s error was “corrected,” but not before it had inflamed the passions of thousands of people.

The Toledo "War" is Over

From Spring to Fall of 1835, these people took themselves so seriously that their skirmishes became a comic part of history. Geography is not as simple as it seems. Sometimes the ending line is simply politics.

Epilogue

In an interesting epilogue, Michigan filed suit in 1966 to reclaim Toledo and lost. It appealed, and lost again in 1973. In 1985, the Ohio Legislature bet possession of some of the disputed territory on the outcome of that year’s Ohio/Michigan football game. The winner of the game would become the “owner” of the land in question. The score? Michigan 27, Ohio 17.

Source

References

  • George, Sister Mary Karl. 1971. The rise and fall of Toledo, Michigan…The Toledo War! Lansing: Michigan Historical Commission.
  • Gilpin, Alec R. 1970. The territory of Michigan 1805-1837. East Lansing: Michigan State University Press.
  • May, George S. 1980. Michigan: A history of the wolverine state (Revised Edition). Grand Rapids: Eerdman.
  • Porter, Tana Mosier. 1987. The Toledo War. In Toledo profile, A sesquicentennial history.
  • Toledo: Toledo Sesquicentennial Commission. (02 Nov 2003).
  • Reimann, Lewis C. 1952. When pine was king. Ann Arbor: Northwoods. Excerpt posted at Alt.Great-Lakes 01 November 1997.
  • Stricharchuk, G. 1985. In the next Ohio-Michigan game, maybe the loser will get Toledo. The Wall Street Journal (Eastern Edition), 24 September.
  • Waggoner, Charles. 1888. History of the city of Toledo and Lucas County, Ohio. New York: Munsell & Company.

(Figures used in this paper were created by the author using Waggoner, May, Gilpin, and George as sources. The Table was created using all listed sources.)

© 2018 Jule Romans

Comments

Submit a Comment

No comments yet.

working

This website uses cookies

As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, owlcation.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: https://owlcation.com/privacy-policy#gdpr

Show Details
Necessary
HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
Features
Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
Marketing
Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
Statistics
Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)