Skip to main content
Updated date:

World War 1 History: Private William Hunter, 18, Executed at Dawn


I try to make history readable and interesting, warts and all. We must look to the past to understand the present and confront the future.

William Hunter

William Hunter (age unknown) (Dec 27, 1897 - Feb 21, 1916). Buried in Maroc British Cemetery in Grenay, France, plot I. B. 38.

William Hunter (age unknown) (Dec 27, 1897 - Feb 21, 1916). Buried in Maroc British Cemetery in Grenay, France, plot I. B. 38.

Allies Executed Far More of Their Own Than Germany

During the First World War, the French executed more than 600 of their own soldiers, though this figure is almost certainly much lower than actuality. The British Army executed 346 British and Commonwealth soldiers for various reasons, though most were shot for desertion. Other reasons cited were murder, cowardice, disobeying a command, sleeping while on duty, striking a superior officer, mutiny, leaving their post or discarding their weapons. By comparison, the German Army executed 48 of their own.

This is the story of a young (very young) British soldier, 10710 Private William Hunter of the 1st Battalion of the Loyal North Lancashire Regiment. It is a story of a callow youth who repeatedly and almost unbelievably failed to connect his actions with their consequences in the middle of a total war that had reduced its inhabitants to the whims and wishes of those in charge of that war.

Sixteen-Year-Old William Joins the British Army

William Hunter was born on December 27, 1897 in North Shields, on the coast just east of Newcastle in North East England. In 1912, at age fourteen, he left school and went to sea. He was a sailor for about two years before he jumped ship in Montreal, Canada because, as he said, he “started to get in trouble”. William then joined the British Army in 1914, lying about his age and saying he was eighteen instead of sixteen. Not wanting to meet up with anyone who might know him, he joined the Loyal North Lancashire Regiment. Private William Hunter soon regretted his decision, but by then there was nothing he could do about it.

William Goes Missing and Loses Heart

In December 1914 he was billeted near the port of Felixstowe, England on the North Sea. On December 12 William was reported missing and remained so until the regimental police found him in town fifteen days later and arrested him on December 27, his seventeenth birthday. He was deprived of five days pay and given fourteen days Field Punishment No. 2 (ankles fettered and wrists handcuffed, but otherwise mobile).

On January 4, 1915, William crossed the English Channel with others to reinforce the 1st Battalion of his regiment at the front. Assuming the sentence was carried out, he would either have been delivered in chains or would have been put in them after joining the battalion-- hardly a promising start either for him or his new comrades. By his own admission, he “did not get on well with the others in the regiment and... lost heart”.

Seven Months Proper Service Without Incident

For the next seven months, from January to August of 1915, seventeen-year-old Private William Hunter performed his duties without further incident. During that time, he was a bayonet man and performed properly on his tours of duty in the trenches. Among other actions, on May 9, 1915, his battalion went over the top near the village of Richebourg as part of the Battle of Aubers Ridge. On that single day the British suffered more than 11,000 casualties with no ground won. It was a complete and utter disaster. Like many other battalions that day, the 1st Loyals suffered heavy casualties, including many officers. After losing so many officers and other ranks and then dealing with an influx of fresh replacements, the 1st Battalion's cohesion was strained and discipline suffered overall.

William Goes Missing Again...

In July 1915, while the regiment was resting at Bethune, France, William ran into some old friends in another regiment and had a good time. Unfortunately for him, he couldn't resist getting together with them on August 6 instead of returning to the trenches with his regiment. He was charged with being absent from Battalion while moving to trenches. His sentence was forfeiture of three days pay and up to ten days Field Punishment No. 1 (tied across a gun wheel or fence; nicknamed “crucifixion”).

Field Punishment Number One

Illustration of Field Punishment Number One. The prisoner is tied to a stationary object, often times a gun carriage wheel and sometimes within enemy artillery range.

Illustration of Field Punishment Number One. The prisoner is tied to a stationary object, often times a gun carriage wheel and sometimes within enemy artillery range.

… And Again

Incredibly, nine days later on August 15, Private Hunter went missing again. For three days he caroused with his old friends in Bethune having a good old time before returning to his unit in the trenches and surrendering. He was found guilty of being absent without leave (but not desertion) and detained for a month awaiting sentencing. He was given two years in prison which was commuted to one year. Then, even that was suspended. At this point it would be difficult to make a case that Private William Hunter was the recipient of harsh punishment from the British Army.

… And Again

The final straw was when, almost immediately after his detention ended and having his sentence suspended, William was reported missing again on September 23, 1915, the day his unit went back to the trenches. His sergeant claimed William was present the day before when the troops were informed of the move, proving he deserted to avoid going to the front line. William's version was that he was still in custody from his previous adventure and was unaware of the order to move. This time he was gone for over two months, until November 30, 1915. Apparently he spent a lot of time once again with his old friends before taking up with a young woman. He later stated that “I did not like to leave her”.

Acting on information regarding a suspicious person at a nearby farm, Private Hunter was picked up on November 30 and taken to the battalion guard room.

William Escapes

Perhaps finally understanding the gravity of the situation, William panicked and managed to escape by smashing open the guard room door the next day. Three days later, on December 4, two privates and a Frenchman found and arrested him at another farm.

William Escapes Again

Unbelievably, neither William nor his captors had benefited from their experiences thus far and, during some confusion about who was in which room, he again managed to slip away the evening of January 5, 1916. And again he was apprehended in woods near a farm three days later, ending his last days of freedom for good.

Final Court Martial

On February 4, 1916, his third-- and final-- court martial was held. He was charged with desertion in the field and two counts of escaping confinement. He pleaded not guilty to all charges. Prosecution witnesses gave evidence of his desertion, his escapes and apprehensions. During the trial, William's prior activities were also presented. Speaking on his own behalf, he maintained he had performed his duties properly from January to August 1915, including participation in the Battle of Aubers Ridge. He stated that he had lied about his age when joining up and that he had been just seventeen during the time of his actions. He said it wasn't until he was held in the guard room and hearing that others had been shot for similar offenses that he became terrified and that drove him to break out. He apologized and asked for leniency and a final chance to redeem himself.

Under cross examination, William maintained that he was not afraid of the trenches, but that he wanted to have a good time. He noted that he had surrendered himself during his previous escapades, but that his last adventure had dragged on so long he was afraid of the consequences.

Private William Hunter was found guilty on all counts and sentenced to be shot. But then the court, alluding to his “extreme youth”, service in the field during January to August and the likelihood of becoming a good fighting man, strongly recommended mercy. From that point, William's fate would depend on his superiors' recommendations as the court's decision made its way up the chain of command from his Lt. Colonel all the way up to the Commander-in-Chief of the BEF, Douglas Haig.

General Wilson: Mercy

Lt. General Sir Henry Wilson (circa 1918)

Lt. General Sir Henry Wilson (circa 1918)



Read More From Owlcation

Lt. Colonel M. Sanderson, 1st Battalion Commander (Feb 6): He “did not know the man himself” but believed Private Hunter would not change and his value as a fighting man was “nil”.


Brigadier General A. McWilliam, 2nd Brigade Commander (Feb 6): After hearing from other officers and N.C.O.s, the general opinion was that Private Hunter did not intend to fight and had the history to back that up. The general was also troubled with the battalion's frequent cases of desertion, sleeping on duty and other crimes and was therefore “unable to endorse the recommendation to mercy recorded by the court”.


Major General A. Holland, 1st Division Commander (Feb 6): After reading his battalion and brigade commander's recommendations, recommended the death sentence.


Lt. General Henry Wilson, 4th Corps Commander (Feb 9): He thought Private Hunter deserved to be shot, but for the fact that William had been only seventeen. He recommended five years penal servitude, not to be suspended.


General C. Munro, 1st Army Commander (Feb 12): “I recommend that the death sentence be put into execution. The man is very young but his Commanding Officer says he is no good as a fighting soldier.

Final Verdict: Execute

General Douglas Haig, Commander-in-Chief (Feb 16): “Confirmed.

General Haig: Execute

General Douglas Haig, Commander-in-Chief BEF (circa 1916)

General Douglas Haig, Commander-in-Chief BEF (circa 1916)

February 21, 1916 Private William Hunter Executed

The 1st Battalion of the Loyal North Lancashire Regiment was ordered to provide one officer and ten men for the firing squad. A medical officer with the appropriate certificates was present, as well as a chaplain. The officer personally loaded all ten rifles with nine live rounds and one blank, the theory being that members of the firing squad would be more reliable if they could console themselves in the belief that they might have fired the blank cartridge. In reality, the presence or absence of recoil would have been glaringly obvious to experienced riflemen.

There are no records of William's demeanor, whether he cried or begged for mercy or went quietly, or whether he was blindfolded or hooded or tied to a post or tied to a chair. Dawn was at 6:50 that morning and all that was recorded is that at 6:58 am on February 21st, 1916, Private William Hunter, aged eighteen, was declared dead, “death being instantaneous”, so at least his comrades had shot true and the officer was not obliged to put a revolver to his skull and finish him off.

The Case For Leniency

There is little doubt that William Hunter deserved severe punishment for his actions. There are those who say his punishment was fitting and that we cannot apply our notion of fairness to a time and place that was so different than the world we inhabit. So let's go back to Private Hunter's world, where the court probably had little leeway in giving him the death penalty, but in the next breath strongly recommended mercy. There was the recommendation of Corps Commander General Wilson, hardly a lenient or inconsequential military leader (he would later be promoted to Field Marshal), who would have had him shot save for the fact that William was seventeen when he committed his crimes. There was definitely bad blood between Haig and Wilson, but whether or not that entered into their deliberations is not known. In any case, it all boiled down to Haig's final, terse “Confirmed”.

Memorial to Those Executed

Shot at Dawn Memorial Garden, Alrewas, Staffordshire, England.

Shot at Dawn Memorial Garden, Alrewas, Staffordshire, England.


Ninety years later the Armed Forces Act of 2006 pardoned 306 of the 346 executed during World War One, acknowledging that injustices had occurred in some cases, especially as related to “Shell Shock” or, as we now call it, “Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder”. The remaining 40 executed for murder or mutiny were not pardoned. As late as 1993, Prime Minister John Major had spoken against pardons, saying all those executed had had fair trials and that pardoning any would be an insult to those who had died in battle.

In the Shot at Dawn Memorial in Staffordshire, England, are 306 wooden stakes; one is for Private William Hunter. The stakes are arranged in a semicircle around a statue of 17-year-old Private Herbert Burden who was shot for desertion several months after William Hunter was executed.

Dramatization of an Execution at Dawn

Questions & Answers

Question: When do we try the Generals for mass murdering their own troops in WWI?

Answer: By the time patriotic fervor ends and documents sealed for 50-100 years are released and it becomes politically viable to do so, the generals (and politicians) are long dead.

© 2016 David Hunt


Jay C OBrien from Houston, TX USA on November 30, 2018:

What should we say about all this? It is wrong to kill or harm another person. It is wrong to teach people to kill or harm another. People who teach murder and harm are mentally ill. There is no need for an individual to join the military. If war or civil commotion arrives, move away from it. Positions of high authority seem to drive people mad. Do not participate in the violence of others.

David Hunt (author) from Cedar Rapids, Iowa on October 21, 2018:

William Hunter's family lived on Coronation Street in North Shields.

Peter Middleton on October 20, 2018:

does anyone know where William lived in north shields

Martin Patrick on November 11, 2017:

We should pardon all the soldiers who were executed for so called military offences.they were found guilty on the grounds they deserted their units.they deserve to be pardoned.

David Hunt (author) from Cedar Rapids, Iowa on November 01, 2017:

Aidyn, I'm always amazed when relatives or friends comment on one of my articles. I hope I did him justice.

Aidyn Bain on October 31, 2017:

This guy was my great great great Uncle and this was very sad to read about him. He was such a brave kid.

John Welford from Barlestone, Leicestershire on April 24, 2017:

Under those circumstances, there is little else that the Army could have done. They were fighting a war under desperate conditions and could have done without the distractions caused by one man who ran rings around them for months. On the other hand, he was far too young to have been placed in that situation and clearly did not have the strength of character that would have seen him through.

Nell Rose from England on February 18, 2017:

Powerful stuff, and so sad. As you said many of those poor young boys were in shock, shell shock! fascinating read.

Louise Powles from Norfolk, England on February 06, 2017:

How interesting. It's a shame he was executed though, but I guess things were a lot tougher back then. And so young too. =(

David Hunt (author) from Cedar Rapids, Iowa on July 28, 2016:

Thank you so much for commenting, Kirsty. I agree wholeheartedly that William was brave-- going to sea at 14, lying about his age and joining the army at 16 and fighting in the trenches. Until the very end, however, he seemed to not understand the severe consequences of his actions. After all he was a boy who was caught up in circumstances even older men couldn't understand. I hope I have done justice to your great-great-uncle's story.

Kirsty Hunter Rush on July 28, 2016:

This is my Great, great uncle. To me and I would say most if not all of our family he was a brave boy who never understood the consequences of war.

David Hunt (author) from Cedar Rapids, Iowa on June 03, 2016:

Thank you, Graham. I'm glad you liked the way I led up to his execution. I found it very interesting how his case moved (very quickly and based on subordinate comments) up the chain of command, with only the immediate court and General Wilson recommending mercy. Different times? Sure. But that's what the mindsets of rigid top-down control and "making examples of" instead of justice produces in any day and age.

Graham Lee from Lancashire. England. on June 03, 2016:

Well done David, another superb article from you. Always tip top research and presentation. You approach to the execution was excellent. I enjoyed the whole article as usual.


David Hunt (author) from Cedar Rapids, Iowa on March 12, 2016:

Thanks, Larry. If there's one thing better than a reader who enjoys what they read, it's a reader who expects to enjoy what they read and isn't disappointed.

Larry Rankin from Oklahoma on March 12, 2016:

I always just love your historical writings.

David Hunt (author) from Cedar Rapids, Iowa on February 23, 2016:

Edward and emge, glad you both enjoyed the article and your comments are appreciated.

MG Singh emge from Singapore on February 23, 2016:

Thanks mate for a wonderful post. Reading such tales widens the horizon. There have been similar cases in all armies of the world, but one need not shed a tear as a soldier is supposed to live with honor.

Ed Palumbo from Tualatin, OR on February 23, 2016:

In a war so wasteful of life and characterized by wholesale slaughter in the field of battle, many of these executions now seem primitive and pointless. Today, we readily acknowledge other punishments would be more appropriate. Perhaps we are more "evolved" now, though the nature of warfare has changed little.

David Hunt (author) from Cedar Rapids, Iowa on February 23, 2016:

Thanks for sharing, Davika.

Devika Primić from Dubrovnik, Croatia on February 23, 2016:

I Tweeted!

David Hunt (author) from Cedar Rapids, Iowa on February 22, 2016:

Thanks, Nate. I agree that we need to try to understand the times. If a hundred American or British soldiers were killed and wounded in one day, the headlines would scream just as loud as when 11,000 British soldiers fell on May 9, 1915. So, yes, different times. But if casualties were to mount and keep mounting during our times, I would not be surprised to see a growing acceptance of casualties and martial law. That's what total war does.

Nathan Bernardo from California, United States of America on February 22, 2016:

Kind of amazing. Interesting how drastic they were at that time for such an offense. Of course, attitudes vary when it comes to desertion. Still, very interesting story and I think it's important to understand the way it was back then and that execution could actually occur for such an offense.

Related Articles