An isoquant is a firm’s counterpart of the consumer’s indifference curve. An isoquant is a curve that shows all the combinations of inputs that yield the same level of output. ‘Iso’ means equal and ‘quant’ means quantity. Therefore, an isoquant represents a constant quantity of output. The isoquant curve is also known as an “Equal Product Curve” or “Production Indifference Curve” or Iso-Product Curve.”
The concept of isoquants can be easily explained with the help of the table given below:
Table 1: An Isoquant Schedule
|Combinations of Labor and Capital||Units of Labor (L)||Units of Capital (K)||Output of Cloth (meters)|
The above table is based on the assumption that only two factors of production, namely, Labor and Capital are used for producing 100 meters of cloth.
Combination A = 5L + 9K = 100 meters of cloth
Combination B = 10L + 6K = 100 meters of cloth
Combination C = 15L + 4K = 100 meters of cloth
Combination D = 20L + 3K = 100 meters of cloth
The combinations A, B, C and D show the possibility of producing 100 meters of cloth by applying various combinations of labor and capital. Thus, an isoquant schedule is a schedule of different combinations of factors of production yielding the same quantity of output.
An iso-product curve is the graphic representation of an iso-product schedule.
Thus, an isoquant is a curve showing all combinations of labor and capital that can be used to produce a given quantity of output.
An isoquant map is a set of isoquants that shows the maximum attainable output from any given combination inputs.
Read More From Owlcation
Isoquants Vs Indifference Curves
An isoquant is ‘analogous’ to an indifference curve in more than one way. The properties of isoquants are similar to the properties of indifference curves. However, some of the differences may also be noted. Firstly, in the indifference curve technique, utility cannot be measured. In the case of an isoquant, the product can be precisely measured in physical units. Secondly, in the case of indifference curves, we can talk only about higher or lower levels of utility. In the case of isoquants, we can say by how much IQ2 actually exceeds IQ1 (figure 2).
Properties of Isoquants
1. An isoquant lying above and to the right of another isoquant represents a higher level of output.
This is because of the fact that on the higher isoquant, we have either more units of one factor of production or more units of both the factors. This has been illustrated in figure 3. In figure 3, points A and B lie on the isoquant IQ1 and IQ2 respectively.
At point A we have = OX1 units of Labor and OY1 units of capital.
At point B we have = OX2 units of Labor and OY1 units of capital.
Though the amount of capital (OY1) is the same at both the points, point B is having X1X2 units of labor more. Therefore, it will yield a higher output.
Hence, it is proved that a higher isoquant shows a higher level of output.
2. Two isoquants cannot cut each other
Just as two indifference curves cannot cut each other, two isoquants also cannot cur each other. If they intersect each other, there would be a contradiction and we will get inconsistent results. This can be illustrated with the help of a diagram as in figure 4.
In figure 4, the isoquant IQ1 shows 100 units of output produced by various combinations of labor and capital and the curve IQ2 shows 200 units of output,
On IQ1, we have A = C, because they are on the same isoquant.
On IQ2, we have A = B
Therefore B = C
This is however inconsistent since C = 100 and B = 200. Therefore, isoquants cannot intersect.
3. Isoquants are convex to the origin
An isoquant must always be convex to the origin. This is because of the operation of the principle of diminishing marginal rate of technical substitution. MRTS is the rate at which marginal unit of an input can be substituted for another input making the level of output remain the same.
In figure 5, as the producer moves from point A to B, from B to C and C to D along an isoquant, the marginal rate of technical substitution (MRTS) of labor for capital diminishes. The MRTS diminishes because the two factors are not perfect substitutes. In figure 5, for every increase in labor units by (ΔL) there is a corresponding decrease in the units of capital (ΔK).
It cannot be concave as shown in figure 6. If they are concave, MRTS of labor for capital increases. But this is not true of isoquants.
Since MRTS must diminish, the isoquants must be convex to the origin.
4. No isoquant can touch either axis
If an isoquant touches the X-axis it would mean that the commodity can be produced with OL units of labor and without any unit of capital.
Point K on the Y-axis implies that the commodity can be produced with OK units of capital and without any unit of labor. However, this is wrong because the firm cannot produce a commodity with one factor alone.
5. Isoquants are negatively sloped
An isoquant slopes downwards from left to right. The logic behind this is the principle of diminishing marginal rate of technical substitution. In order to maintain a given output, a reduction in the use of one input must be offset by an increase in the use of another input.
Figure 8 shows that when the producer moves from point A to B, the amount of labor increases from OL to OL1, but the units of capital decreases from OK to OK1, to maintain the same level of output.
The impossibility of horizontal, vertical or upward sloping isoquants can be shown with the help of the following diagrams.
Consider figure 9(A)
At point A, we have OL units of labor and OK units of capital and at B, we have OL1 units of labor and OK units of capital.
OL1 + OK > OL + OK, and so combination B will yield a higher output than A. Therefore, points A and B on the IQ curve cannot represent an equal level of the product. Hence, the isoquant cannot be a horizontal straight line like AB.
Consider figure 9(B)
At point A, we have OL units of labor and OK units of capital. At point B, we have OL units of labor and OK1 units of capital.
Since B is having KK1 more units of capital it is wrong to assume that both A and B will yield the same level of output. The conclusion is that the isoquant cannot be a vertical straight line.
Similarly at point B in figure 9(C), we have LL1 units of more labor and KK1 units of more capital. As compared to point A, both the inputs are higher at point B. Therefore, it is absurd to assume that both the combinations A and B will give the same level of output.
6. Isoquants need not be parallel
The shape of an isoquant depends upon the marginal rate of technical substitution. Since the rate of substitution between two factors need not necessarily be the same in all the isoquant schedules, they need not be parallel.
7. Each isoquant is oval-shaped
An important feature of an isoquant is that it enables the firm to identify the efficient range of production consider figure 11.
Both the combinations Q and P produce the same level of total output. But the combination Q represents more of capital and labor than P. combinations Q must therefore be expensive and would not be chosen. The same argument can be made to rule out combination T or any other combination lying on a portion of the isoquant where the slope is positive. Positively sloped isoquants imply that an increase in the use of labor would require an increase in the use of capital to keep production constant.
In general, for any input combination on the positively sloped portion of an isoquant, it is possible to find another input combination with less of both the inputs on the negatively convex portion that will produce the same level of output. Therefore, only the negatively sloped segment of isoquant is economically feasible.
In figure 12, the segment P1S1 is the economically feasible portion of the isoquant for IQ. If we consider such feasible portions for all the isoquants, then the region comprising of these portions is called the economic region of production. A producer will operate in this region. It is shown in figure 12. The lines OP1P2 and OS1S2 are called ridge lines. Ridge lines may be defined as lines separating the downward sloping portions of a series of isoquants from the upward sloping portions. They give the boundary of the economic region of production.
Questions & Answers
Question: What does an isoquant mean? And what are its assumptions?
Answer: An isoquant is also known as isoproduct curve or equal product curve. There are four factors of production, namely land, labor, capital and organization. These factors of production are essential to produce any good or service. An isoquant is a curve that is derived from various combinations of any two of the four factors of production and represents same level of output. Though combinations of two factors change along the curve, the output remains constant. Thus, an isoquant helps a business to choose the best cost-effective combination of factors of production.
There are two important assumptions of an isoquant. Firstly, the technical conditions are constant. This means that there are no changes in the available production technology. Secondly, the two factors of production under consideration are combined as efficiently as possible.
Uzaif on August 15, 2020:
Oyindamola Ayeotan on February 22, 2020:
Thanks for the comprehensive explantion
Abdulkerim Rago on February 15, 2020:
Great explanation sir IAM appreciate the you write.
Putradev on February 14, 2020:
I really appreciated the explanation Sir. Lovely explanation.
Love from Mauritius.
Severina mallo on February 07, 2020:
Good notes..... I enjoyed to study this because it is good for understanding...
Santosh Bhatta on January 08, 2020:
Remarkable explanation sir; you are Great!!!!!
Fuck boy on November 26, 2019:
Great explanation sir IAM appreciate the you write.
Zain-UL-Abdin Narejo on November 25, 2019:
this is very helpfull and easy to understand
Kenneth Adams on November 14, 2019:
Thank you so much. I love the explanation
Jannet dhaliwal on November 13, 2019:
Hinsonkwakye on November 05, 2019:
How can i be economics best student
Nankya janat on October 18, 2019:
thanks really helpful
Kuki on September 30, 2019:
Rajneesh on September 18, 2019:
Very well explained and easy to understand
Purity on September 15, 2019:
You've made me understand economics, something that has always been a problem to me.
Many many thanks
Sandesh on September 11, 2019:
Thank uh sir...
I became satisfied with ur words
Thanks 4 making our study easy
Sisira Kumara on July 28, 2019:
thanks i learnt lot
Royce on April 22, 2019:
Thanks on April 16, 2019:
pallav on April 13, 2019:
Sk Tiwary on January 02, 2019:
Thanku sir ji
Harsh on December 19, 2018:
Thank so much sir
Emerson on December 19, 2018:
Thank you sir...nice information..very useful..
ridhi jain on December 11, 2018:
a wonderful explanation
Rinki Saikia on December 06, 2018:
Thank you sir
sreyapauly on November 27, 2018:
Rajat Kumar.. on November 23, 2018:
This explanation ...is clear all my doubts about isoquant...
Thank u so much....
Nuthan Varma on November 10, 2018:
Nice information about the topic
Except for on November 08, 2018:
soham on November 08, 2018:
Vivek on October 26, 2018:
Very lucid and nice explanation
PRANJAL JAIN on October 24, 2018:
thanks for helping us in very esay language.
Naveen on October 23, 2018:
Mahendra on October 12, 2018:
Thanks for explaining this concept ...
Rahmat ali on October 11, 2018:
Me on September 24, 2018:
Alfa on September 18, 2018:
K. Hemalatha on June 08, 2018:
Thank u it was very easy to understand
Asif sheikh on May 30, 2018:
Vry Vry 9c explanation in easy words
stylish wi on May 29, 2018:
Nitesh Tiwari on April 09, 2018:
Thanks For very good explanation in easy way
Shweneemo on April 04, 2018:
Thank you so much for a very good and understandable content
Mafiza on March 28, 2018:
Thank you sir
Abc on March 14, 2018:
This is very complicated
rahuse on March 07, 2018:
thank u...good explanation
Nol B on February 14, 2018:
I love it, continue with the tradition
Hagai Maleko on February 11, 2018:
Nice one. Thanks a lot
Maira on January 30, 2018:
Thanks! Very easy to understand
nandu on January 21, 2018:
mulugeta on December 29, 2017:
Thanks for your help I have got enough information
Somnath nanda on December 26, 2017:
Very easy to understand and i like the explanation that's given.
Gayatri on December 01, 2017:
Very easy to understand
js ranjan on November 29, 2017:
irum on November 21, 2017:
excellent i have learnt from it
mangulu on November 19, 2017:
Very short your language easy to understand Good I Like You
Mathew Odong Ongom on November 14, 2017:
Thanx so very much
Arbind Kumar on November 06, 2017:
Very well explained, short & crisp. Thanks
shreya on November 04, 2017:
Very good, language is cLear n understandable ...cry helpfull
Nikhil on October 29, 2017:
manjusha on October 25, 2017:
this scale it is so easy to understand
Sandhya on October 22, 2017:
Thanks a lot for the easiest explanation..
Jahau Biaknia-the mizo on October 05, 2017:
I'm really satisfied to your explanation..easy way of understanding..thanks a million
Clement on September 12, 2017:
Very easy to understand
Jamela on September 04, 2017:
Nice presentation . Thank you
God bless you
Anarsha on August 31, 2017:
Jigyasa on July 04, 2017:
Nicely explained for the beginners
Muna on May 23, 2017:
Easiest presentation ever! Thanks :) .....
Suman on May 01, 2017:
Thankyou very much...
Angel on March 14, 2017:
Very nice and detailed explanation and simple illustrations to understand easily.......thankq so much
It is very helpful to me
Feriha on March 12, 2017:
:) on March 11, 2017:
Kumuda on March 07, 2017:
Thank yu for the info.
saumya singh on February 28, 2017:
Nice........ micelleneous concept....thanks
Niphiya on February 03, 2017:
shija pastory on February 02, 2017:
Bibin on February 02, 2017:
This is really well explained and extremely simple to understand. Thanks a lot.
MADHUSUDHANA P NAYAK on January 01, 2017:
very easy to understand......
xyz on December 30, 2016:
thanx alot this is very much helpful to me :)
priya yadav on December 16, 2016:
Its really helpful
ndfaho on December 10, 2016:
cool ...good explanation
malathi on December 08, 2016:
some other information is add for hel
Saket on November 30, 2016:
awesome explanation it helps a lot....
Kartik chauhan on November 23, 2016:
Well and good presentation with diagram
firstname.lastname@example.org on November 10, 2016:
Rilly proud to be an economist nice article
email@example.com on November 08, 2016:
michael .M.Dlamini on November 02, 2016:
it exceptionally well explained
hitesh uttam on October 03, 2016:
HArShiL on September 08, 2016:
Nice & osum pls something also be include in this
sharon bule on August 09, 2016:
very helpful explanation ..... thanx
daya on July 26, 2016:
thanks for our great support
mesbah on June 17, 2016:
thanks its supported me
Ali Said on March 27, 2016:
nanda on February 08, 2016:
Thank u ..
waqar on December 31, 2015:
Thanks a lot sir
Prashant pandey on December 05, 2015:
Its a grt explanation nd very helpful 4 all....thnx alot
Jabbar Ul Haq Malik on October 30, 2015:
thank you so much sir g it is very helpful for me
Mayank on October 21, 2015:
Pranav Unnithan on October 14, 2015:
Sandeep on October 12, 2015:
Thanks it is very helpful for me
Catherine on August 04, 2015:
Thanks a tonne!