Credibility vs. Mind Control

Updated on May 22, 2018
jennyeswartz profile image

Jenny has been obsessed with coral reefs at a young age and enjoys sharing her knowledge on the subject.

Source

What is Credibility?

Credibility comes in degrees and provides one reason to be either extremely suspicious of what one hears, extremely quick to believe it, or any strength of acceptance in between. “Cred” is the latin root for “I believe”. In many instances, a claim may lack evidence or any proof to support it—requiring the assessment to be based on the grounds of credibility. If a claim is not credible, it is not believable. In addition, both the claim and its source require credibility.

Credibility, is more often than not, based on the amount of expertise and experience an individual making a statement holds. For instance, a brain surgeon would have much more knowledge on an aneurism than a police officer. And all of this expertise and experience is measured by the background information and knowledge a person holds. Knowledge is simply the most credible source of all and it is measured by education, experience, accomplishments and reputation.

However, the knowledge of an individual can be compromised by our own personal observations and background information; sometimes requiring us to suspend our judgement. For example, the same brain surgeon discussed above could be dressed in a police uniform and could easily be misjudged as an individual that is not a brain surgeon, and instead a police officer. First impressions rarely equate to a person’s credibility. Additionally, one must assess the source of a claim. Even if a source is an interested party (employers, news sources or any personnel receiving compensation) for instance, in a court case, we must stay suspicious on the grounds of accuracy and truthfulness among other factors. These all play into an individuals’ and/or sources’ credibility.

Knowledge is simply the most credible source of all and it is measured by education, experience, accomplishments and reputation.

Mind Controllers in Indonesia

An article called "In Indonesia, Controlling The Weather Is Just Another Job" uses various types of slanters (a term I will discuss later) to justify its claims. First off, the first claim asserted in this article is that humans possess supernatural powers. The article is about the high demand of shamans or pawang hujan, “rain shamans”, during the cold seasons in Indonesia when rain is a likely occurrence. According to the sorcerer, Aryo Hanindyojati, humans have the ability to control the weather. This claim seems wildly unlikely considering occurrences like hurricanes and storms that have wrecked and damaged cities throughout the world.

If humans could control the weather, massive devastations by destructive weather would have been controlled. Secondly, the grounds of expertise do not seem to stand so well. In the article, Hanindyojati is quoted saying his friend learned to “control the universe” in about an hour. Yes, it is true that if we put our minds to it, we can move matter and manipulate certain properties of our Earth physically. However, based on simple math and physics, it is improbable that someone could control the elements using only their mind (perhaps in a George Lucas movie, but not in reality). Also, learning to do something in “about an hour” does not hold any grounds of knowledge by way of education, experience, accomplishments, and reputation. How is it possible to learn something so extreme in as little as an hour?

The only reasonable explanation would be that this person has supernatural powers, which, unfortunately, is not quite so reasonable.

Source

Slanters and Fallacies of Mind Control

While credibility plays a big part in assuring a claim is valid, a common strategy for persuasion is through rhetoric. Slanters are a type of rhetoric that affects an audience’s beliefs without the use of reason or logic. Sometimes, slanters can strengthen or weaken a claim; it depends on the type of language. There can be positive slanters or negative slanters, but generally they are used to excuse extreme or illogical circumstances.

There are a few uses of slanters and fallacies being used in the previously mentioned article. The first and foremost fallacy is wishful thinking. The article makes it seem true that shamans in Indonesia can control the weather because they want it to be true. We have yet to explain things like telepathy and mind-control, simply because we have no logical basis behind such questionable practices.

A second fallacy that is not as apparent, is the “argument” from common practice. The reason behind shamans continuing to practice their mind control is because another shaman taught them, and so on, and so on. It could also be an “argument” from tradition in this sense. In order for a shaman to justify their so-called powers, they either prove it, or say something about how another shaman showed them. It simply does not line up, which leads us to the line-drawing fallacy. Because controlling the weather is a vague concept, the argument has no clear line. Each of these fallacies are used in this article and generally by anyone who claims they can control the weather.

Although many of us want it to be true, that does not make the idea of mind-control a valid concept. One can argue for hours, but in all seriousness, mind control is not widely known or proved to be an actuality or common practice.

Is Mind Control Real?

It is hypothesis such as mind-control that can only be proven using slanters or fallacies. Luckily, this news source is credible and this article was mostly unbiased and objective (despite the last paragraph implying the shaman may have been so convincing, he may have mind controlled the author himself). At any rate, mind control is certainly a fun concept to think about, and some wishful thinking in moderation is acceptable.

As far as inconclusive concepts such as mind control goes, hard evidence and a substantial amount of empirical data is required to prove anything true. Until then, people will have to rely on the use of fallacies. This is why credibility outweighs almost everything when trusting the news, hiring teachers, science journals, and in a job application for becoming a brain surgeon.

With all things considered, it’s best to say at the very least that mind control is a fun pop-culture concept, but it holds no merit in reality. The only person that controls your thoughts? You.

Comments

    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment

    • profile image

      Browser SSO 

      2 months ago

      Search - WOW!

    • AshutoshJoshi06 profile image

      Ashutosh Joshi 

      2 months ago from New Delhi, India

      One can still believe that science and technology can make mind control possible in the future but anything else like these hymns or spells is utter nonsense.

      If shamanism, vodoo, tantra etc was anything more than just 'cults', the world would have been in total chaos by now. This is where I think the whole credibility debate also looses credibility.

    working

    This website uses cookies

    As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, owlcation.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

    For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: https://owlcation.com/privacy-policy#gdpr

    Show Details
    Necessary
    HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
    LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
    Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
    AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
    Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
    CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
    Features
    Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
    Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
    Marketing
    Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
    Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
    Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
    Statistics
    Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
    ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)