Public Historian and co-author of "Exploring American Girlhood in 50 Historic Treasures" (Rowman & Littlefield, 2021).
We walk the prehistoric environments of Europe. We make our homes in caves or tents, often moving with herds and the season. We gather around the fires, telling stories, praying, and making tools. We hunt and gather, experimenting with the fear of the unknown in order to survive.
We will ultimately survive nearly 300,000 years on this Earth. We will encounter you, unsure of why you look different from us but act in similar manners. We may not be able to communicate with you in our language, and we may be hostile to one another. In other cases, we may work together to survive - seeking the same shelters or hunting the same herds. Thousands upon thousands of years from now, you will stand over our bones, staring at us as if we were just another animal.
But we are not. We are a part of you, of your history. We may even be part of your blood, though that has not yet been proven true. We will influence your ancestors, and watch them as they begin to dominate this vast terrain. One day, perhaps you will see that we are not so different. We live - loving, hurting, surviving, and dying together. We fear the unknown, the power of the elements and the vast uncertainty of life after this one. One day, perhaps you will stare at our skulls and know that although evolution would not permit our people to survive, we are more than dumb cave people.
We are Homo neanderthalensis: Neanderthals.
The Facts of Life
Neanderthals appeared in Europe around 200,000 years ago, co-inhabiting the planet with prehistoric humans until about 30,000 years ago.
The first Neanderthal remains were found in 1856 in the Neander Valley near Dusseldorf, Germany, which gave the bones the name "Neanderthal." Similar fossils have been found in Belgium, Yugoslavia, France, southwestern Asia (Israel and Iraq), and central Asia. It is likely that the Neanderthals developed wherever its ancestor, H. heidelbergensis, lived: mostly Africa. Neanderthals spread throughout Southwestern Asia, Central Asia, and Europe by the time of their extinction.
Neanderthals are similar to human beings (Homo sapiens) in structure and capabilities. However, they have much larger brains than human beings, with a cranial capacity greater than 1450 cc, which extended their range of capabilities far beyond humans of the time. Interpretation of fossils has also indicted that Neanderthals' bodies were used very strenuously - perhaps hiking long distances, lifting heavy materials or animal carcasses, and being capable of wrestling with the giants beasts of the time.
In 1997, DNA was extracted from an 1856 specimen of Homo neanderthalensis. This DNA came from the mitochondria of the individual, rather than the nuclear DNA that is generally used. However, since the only source of change in mitochondrial DNA ("mtDNA") is random mutation, which occurs at a fairly constant rate of 2% every 1 million years, scientists believe this type of DNA to be a reliable source for study.
Studies of this DNA have shown that there are approximately 25 differences between modern humans and Neanderthals, suggesting that the two species separated on the human family tree about 600,00 years ago. This is consistent with other fossil evidence that points to H. heidelbergensis as our common ancestor with Neanderthals, meaning that we co-existed with them for quite a long time.
However, theories about human and Neanderthal DNA mixing through interbreeding are still debated. There is increasing evidence that we likely interbred with Neanderthals, as shown in the TED video featured to your right. Yet this debate remains at the forefront of news about Neanderthals, as seen in this TIME magazine article. Another interesting article can be found from NPR regarding 2010 discoveries in the DNA of Neanderthals.
Neanderthals lived during a time period known as the "Middle Paleolithic," which is also known as the "Middle Stone Age."
The Middle Paleolithic is characterized by varied environments, from richer resources and tundra-like conditions in Europe to the savanna and semi-arid deserts of Africa. Food often varied with the environment. In Europe, evidence suggests that Neanderthals hunted reindeer, bison, wild oxen, horses, mammoths, rhinos, deer, bear, wolves, foxes, birds, and fish. In Africa, they hunted antelope, eland, and buffalo while collecting shellfish at the Klasies River in South Africa.
Two tool assemblages characterize the Middle Paleolithic. First, the Mousterian tools found in Europe and the Near East are large core tools and smaller tools formed by flaking the rock (hitting two rocks together to shape the tool). These tools are believed to have been used for scraping hides (to make clothing), working wood, and could be attached to shafts of wood to form spears and other weapons. Second, the Post-Acheulian tools in Africa were struck off prepared cores, knocking off flakes of predetermined and standard sizes to form the tools. There are various types of tools, most of which have been found around the Klasies River and southern coast of Africa. The oldest of these tools may date to 120,000 years ago, when it is believed that some smaller bands of Neanderthals, as well as bands of modern humans, inhabited the region.
Neanderthals made their homes in caves and rock shelters, though this may be overrepresented as permanent structures like caves are more likely to survive the test of time than open shelters such as tents (which may now lie hidden beneath the city streets and farmlands of Europe). There is evidence that Neanderthals returned to these sites year after year - possibly moving due to seasonal changes or herd migrations. Neanderthals seem to have made extensive use of fire, as layers of thick ash and evidence of hearths are typically found in rock shelters.
Beyond the basics, there is some evidence that Neanderthals had the finer things in life of the time: religion and its accompanying rituals. Evidence of deliberate burials has been found at several sites, include a 16-year-old boy buried at Le Moustier with fashioned stone axes near his hands, five children and two adults interred together in a plot at La Ferrassie, and pollen in and around a man's body at the Shanidar cave in Iraq (which suggests the use of flowers in the burial). Additionally, a stone-lined pit with the stacked skulls of seven cave bears was found at Drachenloch in the Swiss Alps. Given that cave bears were nearly nine feet tall, it is believed that the skulls may be part of a religious honoring or appeasing of the cave bears' spirits.
What happened to them?
There are three primary theories as to why Neanderthals disappeared from the fossil record.
First, some believe that Neanderthals and humans interbred over time, leading to the eventual disappearance of Neanderthals. While this is one of the more probable theories, there is very little evidence to support "hybrids" of the two species and no known artifacts support co-habitation. The debate over this theory continues today.
Second, others believe that modern humans may have killed off Neanderthals in a paleolithic genocide. Againt, there is little to no evidence to support this theory, as no "murdered" Neanderthal has been found to date. Also, the advanced physical strength of Neanderthals, as compared to the more gracile humans of the time, would suggest that any genocide would have been short-lived.
Finally, it is generally believed that as the climate changed and modern humans became more populous, moving into regions occupied by the Neanderthals, that competition for resources would have driven the Neanderthals to extinction. Much like what occurs with other species who are forcibly pushed from their homes or face new threats from invading species, Neanderthals' food supply, homes, and other resources would have been in-demand by the intruding modern humans, pushing Neanderthals into Western Europe. With smaller populations, less efficiency as hunters and gatherers, the need for more calories per day than modern humans, and perhaps a non-confrontational attitude (as there is little evidence of any confrontation between the two), it is most plausible that Neanderthals simply "disappeared" over time.
This third theory is substantially backed by fossil evidence. Most findings indicate that humans slowly pushed Neanderthals into the Iberian peninsula (where Spain is currently located), as this is where the most recent Neanderthal fossils have been found. It is likely that such Neanderthals were like "refugee" populations, retreating from the increased competition over resources until, eventually, there was nowhere to go and they died out.
This content was accurate and true to the best of the author’s knowledge at the time of publication but may be out of date. The information contained in this article may not reflect current policies, laws, technology, or data.
Questions & Answers
Question: There is always the comparison of "Modern" Humans and Neanderthals. But would there as great of a difference in say, height between the two at the time? Many statements talk about how muscular they were, but are "Modern" humans not evolving towards being faster and stronger? Could the small gift of DNA Modern humans carry from Neanderthals, be a special extra boost or push up the evolutionary ladder which saved us from extinction as well?
Answer: That’s an interesting question, and one I don’t have a particular answer for. It would take some serious DNA studies to discuss whether height or whether Neanderthal DNA in modern humans gives us any evolutionary advantage. The discussions on “muscular” Neanderthals are more geared towards pointing out that, physically, they were much more like the great apes - their physical strength was far greater than other humans of the same time. Whether this strength has, through DNA, played a part in our modern evolution is difficult to determine - firstly because we are not always able to point out exactly what parts of DNA come from Neanderthals, but also because over the millennia since Neanderthals, our genes have mutated independently.
© 2011 Tiffany Isselhardt
Wayne Duplessis from Surabaya, East Java, Indonesia on January 08, 2014:
Interesting hypotheses exist on early humans and it's always good to have more ideas for the discussion. Thank you for the obvious effort and the entertaining presentation.
BigBlue54 from Hull, East Yorkshire on March 01, 2013:
Interesting hub Southern Muse and I agree environmental factors were involved but I do not believe our ancestors were greatly involved in the end of the Neanderthals. Firstly a lot of them died out before our ancestors arrived. So in a number of areas they never met.
Secondly the effects of environmental changes on Neanderthals are more to do with the way they hunted. They used a very substantial spear and were more used to hunting in wooded areas where the could ambush pray. When the environment changed it led to more open grassland where the heavy spear they used would be of little use to them. Our ancestors were using a spear thrower and a dart of about six foot long. With a range of up to 70 yards the hunter could take advantage of the open grassland in hunting their pray. So it was not really a clash as they were just not equipped to compete.
Thirdly, they had evolved for a very cold climate. I should explain. In the last one million years we have spent 900,000 in one ice age or another. The Neanderthals had basically evolved to deal with that. The thing is to do this meant they required some 6000 calories a day, whereas our ancestors required half that. Because they were not getting enough food this was effecting their numbers and would be why their birthrate dropped.
So the problem was they had become to specialised and were not in a position to change anything.
Pirosmaneshvili mentions the DNA. I would wait on that until the dust settles on that one. I have also heard about that but another explanation is that this was common to both species but modern Africans lost it. As I say, wait until the dust settles.
Just to give you one final thought. Did you know that 71,000 years ago a super volcano exploded and the environmental impact was such that we nearly became extinct. As Nietzsche said, What does not kill us makes us stronger.
Robert Oughton Smith from Oman on January 04, 2013:
Southern Muse: Thanks for the interesting article although more could have been said on the anatomical differences between the two species. Also needs some updating: we now know quite clearly that all modern humans who are non-African carry with them approximately 4% Neanderthal genes. Thus at some point, there was interbreeding. Similarly, all African modern humans have zero genes from Neanderthals, so are "pure" Homo sapiens.
Lone77star: I'm afraid you are on the wrong website. This website is not concerned with the bizarre activity of linking the bible to prehistory or vice versa.
James Kenny from Birmingham, England on March 04, 2012:
A very interesting article about a fascinating species. I remember watching a documentary that stated that the Neanderthal extinction wasn't inevitable. Apparently, if their birth rates had been just 2% higher and the mortality rates 2% lower they may have hung on. Voted up.
Rod Martin Jr from Cebu, Philippines on June 14, 2011:
Southern Muse, I love your writing. Very nice hook for your lead in -- powerful empathy for the species. Nicely done.
Second paragraph in DNA may have a typo. Is the separation 60,000 years ago or 600,000 (instead of 600,00)? I'm guessing 600,000 from the context. Easily corrected.
I stumbled onto a rather interesting theory of my own while researching hidden meaning in Genesis, first book of the Bible. Okay, granted this is not science, but the evidence I found seems compelling from a biblical perspective. Only time will tell if science finds corroborating evidence in nature.
What I found explains the seemingly outrageous longevity of the early patriarchs, includes the Jewish Kabbalah's "Tree of Life" pattern embedded in two chapters, and gives us a timeline compatible with those of science.
One curious fact is that this new timeline contains two dates which match dates given by American clairvoyant, Edgar Cayce in his readings in the first half of the 20th century. The new timeline dates are within 1% of Cayce's rounded approximations -- a veritable bulls-eye. The dates? Noah's Flood at 27,970 BC and Adam at 10,454,130 BC. I know anthropologists will have a seizure from laughter at the Adam date. But hey, there are many more bones to be discovered. As always, the current lack of evidence is no proof. It may only mean that we have not yet discovered such proof, or that such proof never existed. Either way, we don't know.
It startled me, when comparing this new biblical timeline with those of science, to discover that Homo neanderthalensis disappeared about the same time -- 28,000 BC.
And then the wording in Genesis 6 slapped me in the face, waking me to the identity of the enigmatic characters portrayed there.
One gigantic question that no one has ever asked (at least to my knowledge), is what really motivated God to bring Noah's Flood? Sure, we're not certain there was a worldwide flood. There are many problems with the story, scientifically. But say it did happen. The stated reasons of wickedness, violence and a corruption of flesh don't tell us much. The Flood cured something, as implied by God's promise never again to use the Flood. But humanity was not cured of ordinary wickedness and violence. And what does "corruption of flesh" mean? Tattoos? Hardly!
Somehow, the "sons of God" found the "daughters of man" to be "hot" and they tied the knot.
Two main theological theories try to explain who these two groups were. I don't buy either one of them. I won't belabor them here. The "sons of God" seem to me to be the children of God created in Genesis 1:26 and 2:7 -- the spiritual and the physical -- immortal spirit wrapped in Homo sapiens flesh.
If the "sons" were Homo sapiens, then who were the "daughters?" Homo neanderthalensis? If God's purpose was the awakening of His children from their poisoned slumber (Forbidden Fruit), then Homo sapiens, language and civilization were critical to that awakening. Sleeping immortals have zero chance of plotting their escape. Such involves complex reasoning, and how much can you get done in your dreams. Dreams are chaotic. Homo sapiens consciousness was their new blackboard.
If Homo neanderthalensis did not have the same potential for language and civilization, a mating of the two species could have been viewed as a wickedness, jeopardizing the purpose of God. This would have been a corruption of flesh at a deeply genetic level.
So, could Neanderthal have been the target of Noah's Flood?