The Hicksian Method and The Slutskian Method
Income and Substitution Effects of a Price Change
A change in the price of a commodity alters the quantity demanded by consumer. This is known as price effect. However, this price effect comprises of two effects, namely substitution effect and income effect.
Substitution Effect
Let us consider a twocommodity model for simplicity. When the price of one commodity falls, the consumer substitutes the cheaper commodity for the costlier commodity. This is known as substitution effect.
Income Effect
Suppose the consumer’s money income is constant. Again, let us consider a twocommodity model for simplicity. Assume that the price of one commodity falls. This results in an increase in the consumer’s real income, which raises his purchasing power. Due to an increase in the real income, the consumer is now able to purchase more quantity of commodities. This is known as income effect.
Hence, according to our example, the decline in the price level leads to an increasing consumption. This occurs because of the price effect, which comprises income effect and substitution effect. Now, can you tell how much increase in consumption is due to income effect and how much increase in consumption is due to substitution effect? To answer this question, we need to separate the income effect and substitution effect.
How to separate the income effect and substitution effect?
Let us look at figure 1. Figure 1 shows that price effect (change in P_{x}), which comprises substitution effect and income effect, leads to a change in quantity demanded (change in Q_{x}).
Figure 1
The splitting of the price effect into the substitution and income effects can be done by holding the real income constant. When you hold the real income constant, you will be able to measure the change in quantity caused due to substitution effect. Hence, the remaining change in quantity represents the change due to income effect.
To keep the real income constant, there are mainly two methods suggested in economic literature:
 The Hicksian Method
 The Slutskian method
The Hicksian Method
Let us look at J.R. Hicks’ method of bifurcating income effect and substitution effect.
In figure 2, the initial equilibrium of the consumer is E_{1}, where indifference curve IC_{1} is tangent to the budget line AB_{1}. At this equilibrium point, the consumer consumes E_{1}X_{1} quantity of commodity Y and OX_{1 }quantity of commodity X. Assume that the price of commodity X decreases (income and the price of other commodity remain constant). This result in the new budget line is AB_{2}. Hence, the consumer moves to the new equilibrium point E_{3}, where new budget line AB_{2} is tangent to IC_{2}. Thus, there is an increase in the quantity demanded of commodity X from X_{1} to X_{2}.
An increase in the quantity demanded of commodity X is caused by both income effect and substitution effect. Now we need to separate these two effects. In order to do so, we need to keep the real income constant i.e., eliminating the income effect to calculate substitution effect.
According to Hicksian method of eliminating income effect, we just reduce consumer’s money income (by way of taxation), so that the consumer remains on his original indifference curve IC_{1}, keeping in view the fall in the price of commodity X. In figure 2, reduction in consumer’s money income is done by drawing a price line (A_{3}B_{3})parallel to AB_{2}. At the same time, the new parallel price line (A_{3}B_{3}) is tangent to indifference curve IC_{1} at point E_{2}. Hence, the consumer’s equilibrium changes from E_{1} to E_{2}. This means that an increase in quantity demanded of commodity X from X_{1} to X_{3} is purely because of the substitution effect.
We get the income effect by subtracting substitution effect (X_{1}X_{3}) from the total price effect (X_{1}X_{2}).
Income effect = X_{1}X_{2}  X_{1}X_{3} = X_{3}X_{2}
The slutskian Method
Now let us look at Eugene Slutsky’s method of separating income effect and substitution effect. Figure 3 illustrates the Slutskian version of calculating income effect and substitution effect.
In figure 3, AB_{1} is the initial budget line. The consumer’s original equilibrium point (before price effect takes place) is E_{1}, where indifference curve IC_{1 }is tangent to the budget line AB_{1}. Suppose the price of commodity X falls (price effect takes place) and other things remain the same. Now the consumer shifts to another equilibrium point E_{2}, where indifference curve IC_{3 }is tangent to the new budget line AB_{2}. Consumer’s movement from equilibrium point E_{1} to E_{2} implies that consumer’s purchase of commodity X increases by X_{1}X_{2}. This is the total price effect caused by the decline in price of commodity X.
Now the task before us is to isolate the substitution effect. In order to do so, Slutsky attributes that the consumer’s money income should be reduced in such a way that he returns to his original equilibrium point E_{1} even after the price change. What we are doing here is that we make the consumer to purchase his original consumption bundle (i.e., OX_{1} quantity of commodity X and E_{1}X_{1} quantity of commodity Y) at the new price level.
In figure 3, this is illustrated by drawing a new budget line A_{4}B_{4}, which passes through original equilibrium point E_{1} but is parallel to AB_{2}. This means that we have reduced the consumer’s money income by AA_{4 }or B_{4}B_{2} to eliminate the income effect. Now the only possibility of price effect is the substitution effect. Because of this substitution effect, the consumer moves from equilibrium point E_{1 }to E_{3}, where indifference curve IC_{2} is tangent to the budget line A_{4}B_{4}. In Slutsky version, the substitution effect leads the consumer to a higher indifference curve.
Thus, income effect = X_{1}X_{2 } X_{1}X_{3} = X_{3}X_{2}
Questions & Answers
© 2013 Sundaram Ponnusamy
Comments
This is a very good work but the equilibrium points arent consistent with their respective indifference curves.
HELPFUL
thanks for your clear analyses even though it is very easy,
A GREAT JOB SIR.. WELL EXPLAINED AND ILLUSTRATED
this things are really complicated....i just wonder why i took this class of economics......
Very easy to understand.
it is very to understand i will admire you
amazing
simple and nice explanation
Thaq so much sir for this informetion....
It is very good thanks sir
this was awesome .....well expounded...all due gratitude to u Senior Economists!!!
I'm very happy for this quite helpfull


Well explicated
It's very easy to understand....no explanation is simpler than that
thanks
very nice ,,
Thank you very much. It was quite explicit.
Awesome explanation.. Cannot have an explanation simpler than this.. Much thanks
this is great
Thanks a bunch.
This was extremely helpful, thank you so much
Thank you very much
fantastic idea
Thank you
This has broken it down so well! Thank you!


ohh great
Thank you so much........Your explanations were great!
much clearer with your explanations, thank you
Thank you so much
Great job
thank you very much!
Quite helpful
33