Bringing Back Extinct Animals: Cloning Research and Concerns
A Fascinating Idea
Bringing extinct animals back to life is a tantalizing idea for many people. Although there are problems still to be solved, the process is gradually becoming more feasible. Whereas a few years ago scientists thought that recreating extinct species was an impossible task, some are now saying that it may be within the realm of possibility in the not-too-distant future, at least for some species. In fact, some Japanese scientists predict that they will be able to clone a woolly mammoth within five years.
How could resurrecting an extinct species that has long disappeared from the earth even be possible? The key is finding the DNA, or deoxyribonucleic acid, of the species. DNA is the molecule that contains the genetic code of an organism. The code is the set of instructions for making the animal's body.
Once a sample of an extinct animal's DNA has been found, the next step in the resurrection process is to find an existing animal that has some similarities to the extinct species. The extinct animal's DNA is inserted into an egg of the existing animal and replaces the egg's own DNA. The embryo that develops from the egg is then placed in a surrogate mother to develop.
DNA and Its Significance
DNA is vital in the life of an organism. The chemical is located in the nucleus of our cells. It not only contains the instructions for making a baby from a fertilized egg but also affects many of our body's characteristics during our life. The chemical is also present in animals, plants, bacteria, and some viruses. Even the viruses without DNA contain a similar chemical called RNA or ribonucleic acid.
A lot of research is being done in relation to DNA and its activity, since this molecule is the key to life. The research is helping scientists understand how life works. It's also helping them learn how to manipulate the genes in deoxyribonucleic acid. A gene is a segment of DNA that codes for a particular characteristic of an organism.
It's easier to find DNA from recently extinct animals than from animals that died out long ago, since in dead animals the chemical breaks down over time. Scientists are finding fragments of deoxyribonucleic acid in some ancient animals, however. These animals died in environments that partially preserved their bodies, such as very cold climates. By combining the DNA fragments with an existing animal's DNA in an egg cell (or by replacing the existing animal's deoxyribonucleic acid if the researchers have the complete genetic code of the donor), scientists may be able to create babies that resemble the extinct animal.
In sexually reproducing organisms, the egg contains half of the offspring's DNA and the sperm contains the other half. The sperm inserts its nucleus into the egg. Once the egg nucleus and the sperm nucleus have combined during fertilization, the egg divides and produces an embryo.
Cloning is a process in which identical organisms are produced by a non-sexual process. In cloning, the researchers place all of the DNA needed to make the desired organism in an egg, so no sperm is required. The egg is triggered to divide artificially in order to make an embryo.
Somatic cell nuclear transfer is a common cloning method. In this process, a nucleus containing DNA is extracted from a cell of the desired animal. This nucleus is then inserted into the egg cell of a related animal, which has had its own nucleus removed. The resulting embryo is placed inside a surrogate mother. The baby that develops is identical to the desired animal, not the surrogate mother, and is said to be a "clone" of the desired species.
Synthesis and Cloning
Another cloning method is known as synthesis. In this method, a fragment of the desired organism's DNA (or of DNA produced in a lab) is combined with part of another organism's DNA in an egg cell. The offspring therefore has some of the features of the desired organism, but not all of them. This method may be useful when only some of an extinct animal's DNA has been found.
Recreating the Bucardo or Pyrenean Ibex
The bucardo was a large mountain ibex that was very well adapted for life in a cold and snowy environment. The last one was named Celia. She died in 2000 after being crushed by a tree. With her death, the bucardo became extinct. However, before Celia's death some of her skin cells were removed and preserved.
The nucleus from one of Celia's cells was placed in a goat egg whose nucleus had been removed. This process was repeated, resulting in the production of multiple embryos. 57 embryos were placed in surrogate mothers. Only seven surrogates became pregnant, and only one of these was able to keep the baby alive for the whole length of the gestation period. The successful surrogate was a goat-Spanish ibex hybrid. She gave birth to a clone of Celia. However, the baby had a large, nonfunctional mass attached to the functional part of one of its lungs and was only able to survive for about ten minutes.
The attempt to produce Celia's clone was performed over ten years ago. Since then, cloning techniques have improved significantly. The researchers plan to clone Celia again once they have obtained financial support. However, they don't have any DNA from a male bucardo, so they can't produce a mate for Celia's clone.
Recreating Gastric-Brooding Frogs
The Lazarus Project in Australia has had partial success in recreating gastric-brooding frogs, which became extinct in 1983. The female of this fascinating species swallowed her fertilized eggs. Her youngsters developed in her stomach. The young froglets were released through their mother's mouth.
Scientists collected dead gastric-breeding frogs and kept them in a freezer. In 2013, researchers announced that they had extracted the nucleus from a cell of an animal frozen since the 1970s and implanted it into an egg of a related frog. This procedure was performed multiple times and multiple embryos developed. However, the embryos lived for only a few days. The researchers are continuing their frog cloning attempts.
The researchers investigating the resurrection of the gastric-brooding frog may also attempt to clone the Tasmanian tiger, the dodo, and the woolly mammoth.
Making Mammoth Hemoglobin
Scientists have not only found the code for making mammoth hemoglobin in a surviving fragment of the animal's DNA but have actually made the blood protein.
After identifying the section of mammoth DNA that was responsible for producing hemoglobin, the scientists inserted the section into bacteria. The bacteria followed the "instructions" in the DNA and made hemoglobin, even though the bacteria don't use the chemical themselves. The scientists were then able to compare the properties of mammoth and human hemoglobin.
Hemoglobin is found in mammal red blood cells. It picks up oxygen from the lungs and delivers it to the body's cells. The researchers found that mammoth hemoglobin has a much higher affinity for oxygen at low temperatures than the human version of the chemical. This would have been very helpful for mammoths, who lived in cold and icy environments.
The idea of bringing an entire mammoth back into existence has excited many people. The excitement has intensified since a well-preserved female was discovered in Siberian permafrost in 2013. As scientists moved the mammoth, a dark liquid dripped out of her body, collecting in a cavity in the ice. This liquid was thought to be mammoth blood, although how it stayed in a liquid form for such a long time was and still is mysterious. In 2014, tests confirmed that the liquid was indeed mammoth blood.
Most mammoths died out 10,000 years ago, although one population is believed to have survived until about 4,000 years ago. Researchers have found hemoglobin in the liquid coming from the recovered mammoth's body but no intact blood cells. Like DNA, cells break down after death.
The Siberian animal was a very significant discovery. Once she was transported to a laboratory, tissue samples were obtained from her body. The body was in excellent condition compared to other mammoth finds and yielded a lot of information. For example, the Siberian mammoth died about 40,000 years ago, was about fifty years old when she died, and produced at least eight calves. Partial strands of DNA were extracted from her cells.
A large amount of DNA has been collected from the remains of other mammoths that died in very cold environments. There is talk of inserting mammoth DNA into an elephant egg and using an elephant as a surrogate mother. Could cloning a mammoth work? Possibly, say some scientists.
Activating Dormant Genes
A new word has been added to the scientific vocabulary. Bringing extinct animals back to life is known as "de-extinction". Some scientists are taking another approach to this process instead of transferring DNA. The result of their experiments would produce only partial de-extinction, however. The resulting organisms would have features of both modern organisms and extinct ones. The idea behind the process is to activate specific dormant genes in an organism.
Some organisms contain genes that were functional in their distant ancestors but are no longer active. This is the case for chickens, which contain inactive genes for making a dinosaur-like snout and palate. Birds evolved from dinosaurs. (According to some researchers, modern birds should be classified as dinosaurs.)
In one experiment, researchers "turned off" the genes for making a beak in chicken embryos. As a result, the embryos produced a dinosaur snout and palate instead of a beak. The embryos were not allowed to complete their development, however.
Some Concerns About De-extinction
De-extinction is a fascinating but controversial topic, with many arguments both in support of the idea and against it.
Some concerns about bringing back extinct animals include the following:
- An organism is more than just its genetic code. Events and experiences as it interacts with its environment affect its behavior (and sometimes its genes as well). Extinct animals recreated today would lack their original environment, so would they really be the original animal?
- There are also concerns about how the recreated animals will affect ecosystems. Will they damage the environment or eliminate other species? Will they be doomed to a life of captivity? Will their existence be detrimental to humans?
- Some people feel that the money used for cloning experiments should be used to help solve social problems and aid humans in trouble.
- The ethics of cloning bothers some people. They see genetic manipulation as a way of "playing God" and believe that we have no right to do this.
- Other people are afraid that cloning may be dangerous because we don't know enough about the consequences of manipulating DNA.
- The fact that multiple attempts at cloning are usually necessary in order to get success also upsets people. At the moment, many eggs and embryos die in the quest to create a cloned animal.
- In addition, some people worry about the effect of the embryo of an extinct animal on a surrogate mother. Forcing a modern elephant to produce a mammoth baby or a hybrid elephant-mammoth one could be viewed as cruel. It could also harm the elephant population, since the closest relative to the mammoth is believed to be the endangered Asian elephant.
There is another problem with the idea of de-extinction that bothers some people. Many animals that currently exist are close to extinction. Some researchers feel that it's far more important to work on preventing new extinctions than to recreate extinct animals from the past.
A team of researchers from Harvard University has said that they hope to eventually produce a mammoth-elephant hybrid baby in an artificial womb instead of subjecting an elephant to the pregnancy. The structure doesn't yet exist, however.
Some Possible Benefits of De-extinction
- The factor that spurs many researchers on is the sheer wonder of de-extinction. It would be awesome to discover the true appearance of an animal that we know from only a few bones and to observe the animal's behavior.
- By sparking the public's interest in extinct animals, scientists may also spark their interest in other animals on Earth.
- Many recent animal extinctions have been due to human activities, such as hunting and habitat destruction. Some people feel a sense of justice in the idea of bringing back a species that we destroyed.
- By studying and practicing cloning and genetic manipulation in the creation of extinct animals, scientists are discovering important information about DNA and genes and are learning new skills and techniques. Their knowledge may be useful in the study of human biology and the biology of animals that affect our lives directly, such as farm animals. It may even help scientists prevent and treat diseases.
- Bringing back specific animals may be beneficial in certain ecosystems.
De-extinction - A Poll
What is your opinion about bringing back extinct animals?
Planning for the Future
Zoos and other organizations are obtaining DNA from the animals in their care and preserving it. The good institutions are trying to breed endangered animals to prevent them from becoming extinct. If breeding efforts fail, however, the DNA may enable the species to be recreated in the future.
De-extinction is the only way for us to see animals already lost from the Earth, but it's not an ideal situation and its success is uncertain. It may be a better tactic to protect species that are alive today than to try to resurrect them in the future.
- De-extinction of the bucardo from the BBC
- The Lazarus Project from the Sydney Morning Herald in Australia
- Autopsy of a remarkably well-preserved woolly mammoth in Siberia from the CBC
- 40,000-year-old mammoth blood found from the phys.org news service
- Chicken embryos develop dinosaur snouts from the BBC
- Woolly mammoth resurrection from The Guardian
Questions & Answers
© 2013 Linda Crampton