The Subtlety of Quantum Mechanics

Updated on August 30, 2018
Dishant Varshney profile image

I am a student and a Physics Enthusiast who is trying to understand the Cosmos as it is.

Quantum Mechanics
Quantum Mechanics | Source

The Soul of Quantum Mechanics

Heisenberg’s Uncertainty Principle is the savior of quantum world. If it weren’t in quantum mechanics then, quantum mechanics would have fallen down before it even started. According to Heisenberg, it states, “If you make the measurement with an uncertainty in momentum, you can’t, at the same time, know its x-position more accurately than Δx=ℏ∕Δp”. It has no evidence in the real world but it’s, more or less, like a soul of the quantum world. In spite of the fact that Quantum Mechanics and Theory of Relativity are the foundations of modern science, these two theories are the two extremes of Physics. They both don’t satisfy the same observation at the same time. For instance: look at this figure given below

Quantum Entanglement

Quantum Entanglement
Quantum Entanglement | Source

Quantum Entanglement is one of the skeptical theories of Quantum Mechanics. It states that “If two particles are entangled, or in unison, then no matter how far they are in universe, you can predict the behavior of one particle by observing the other". Dr. Michio Kaku, in his book ‘Physics of the Impossible’, talked about Quantum Entanglement. “Let’s say that a friend always wears one red and one green sock, in random order. Let’s say you examine one leg, and that leg has a red sock on it. then you know, faster than the speed of light, that the other sock is green”, he explained. Albert Einstein said, this effect, "spooky-action-at-a-distance", and did not agree with Quantum Mechanics because the information travels faster than the speed of light which opposes the second law of Theory of Relativity - Nothing can travel faster than the speed of light in vacuum. So, was Einstein wrong? Does information travel faster than the speed of light? From the above example, you might be thinking the answer to both the questions is Yes but Michio Kaku said that this information is useless since the information was random. ‘Information actually traveled faster than light, but this information is useless. No signal containing non-random information can be sent via this method’, he added. Found that strange? Me too. Tighten your seat belt and grab a packet of chips because it’s gonna be stranger.

Double-Slit Experiment

Double-Slit experiment.
Double-Slit experiment. | Source

The concept of photons, used by Max Planck to show the thermal equilibrium between the matter and the electro-magnetic radiation and later used by Einstein to describe the Photoelectric Effect, gives rise to the theory of duality of the particle. The term ‘duality’ refers to the state of a particle where the particle shows dual nature: particle nature and wave nature. This effect is shown by every particle and observable only on a microscopic level or quantum level, but not on a macroscopic level. Richard Feynman showed this quantum behavior in an experiment with the more familiar behavior of particles like bullets and waves. After getting familiar with the difference in result between the bullet experiment and wave experiment, he took electrons to show that electron behaves both as a wave and a particle at the same time. In 1999, a team of Austrian Physicists performed the same experiment using Buckyballs (molecules made of sixty carbon atoms). In the book ‘Grand Design’, Stephen Hawking talked about this experiment by taking an analogous thought experiment which was akin to that of Feynman’s Bullet Experiment. Stephen Hawking, in his thought experiment, considered soccer balls as electrons to show the quantum behavior of electrons.

The double-slit experiment contains all the mysteries of quantum mechanics

— Richard Feynman
Fig. 1 When one of the slits is open.
Fig. 1 When one of the slits is open. | Source

Here is the experiment: An electron gun fires electrons randomly over a large angular distance. In front of the gun, there’s a wall with two holes or slits in it (small enough to pass only the electron). Behind this wall, there’s another wall, called screen, with a buzzer. Whenever an electron strikes the screen, the buzzer produces a sound. Now, when one of the slits is open, the electron goes through only one slit and hit the screen. When a plot is drawn between the probability of hitting the screen when either slit 1 or slit 2 is open versus the distance along the screen, it looks like the plot in Fig. 1 (blue line shows that slit 1 is open and red line shows that slit 2 is open) shown above.

Fig. 2 When both slits are open.
Fig. 2 When both slits are open. | Source

When both slits are open, it looks like the electron can hit the screen by going either from slit 1 or slit 2. It is understood that opening the second slit increases the number of electrons, and hence the probability of electrons, striking the screen but when a plot is drawn between the probability of hitting the screen when both slits are open versus the distance along the screen then, there were regions when we get higher number of electrons (or higher probability than previous case) but at other regions, we get lower number of electrons. At some regions, the probability of electrons striking the screen came out to be zero. This is quite intimidating. In the Fig. 2 shown above, the points where the plot touches the horizontal axis are the points of zero probability.

Feynman's water wave slit experiment.
Feynman's water wave slit experiment. | Source

Feynman's Explanation

In fact, Feynman wrote, “The double-slit experiment contains all the mysteries of quantum mechanics”. It is observed that the pattern we got when both slits are open is similar to the plot when waves (shown above) were taken instead of particles. This concludes that electrons also interfere and behave as waves as well. This arises the regions of zero probability when both slits were open. That means that electrons would have hit the screen in the zero probability region if only one slit was open and don’t strike the same region when both slits are open but here, another problem arises - Electron gun was firing one electron at a time so how does an electron know how many slits were open? “It seems as if, somewhere on their journey from source to screen, the particles (electrons) acquire information about both slits”, Hawking wrote.

Many possible explanations were given by many physicists to explain this quantum behavior. Feynman said that the electrons take every possible path connecting those two points i.e., from source to screen, an electron can take a straight line path or a path to the Mars and comes back on Earth to strike the screen. Looks like the sci-fi movie but it isn’t. According to him, when both slits are open, the electron goes through slit 1 and interfere with the path in which it goes through slit 2 which causes the interference. I have a different perspective to comprehend this phenomenon (this doesn’t happen in reality, it’s just for understanding): When both the slits are open then, electron divides into two halves which go through each slit, and interfere with each other (Interfering with itself doesn’t produce any effect). When only one slit is open, it won’t split into two. Now, the same question arises: how does an electron know about the slits? The answer is simple but intriguing. It's because of the uncertainty in the position of an electron. It can acquire information about the slits before it reaches there. Consider that the electron is about to enter slit 1 but due to uncertainty in its position it could be anywhere near this slit's vicinity. For example: electron may be behind the slit or it may be crossing the slit with certain velocity or it may be about to enter the slit. So, before the electron reaches slit 1, it can get the information about the slit, and can act accordingly.

Fig 3. When electrons are observed.
Fig 3. When electrons are observed. | Source

Need of Uncertainty Principle

You might be thinking that we should make an apparatus which can mark the slit whenever an electron goes through that particular slit and then we can say that the electron goes through either slit 1 or slit 2. Feynman pointed such an apparatus. We can put the lights near the slits so, when the sound from the buzzer is heard, we see a flash either near slit 1 or slit 2. But it changes the outcome and we get a different plot (Fig. 3) which shows no interference pattern. It seems like observing the electron changes its behavior. The photons which are emitted from the light source hit the electron and get scattered. This photon gives an impulse to the electron and changes its path such that the electron didn’t strike the region where it supposed to when there was no light source and therefore, it shows no interference pattern. Now, to decrease the impulse given to the electron by the photon, the momentum of the photon should be decreased. Momentum of the photon(p) is inversely proportional to its wavelength(λ): p = h / λ (h = Planck’s constant). When the wavelength is made more than the separation of the slits, the impulse gets decreased, and the plot obtained looks similar to the plot (Fig. 2) when no light was used. But by decreasing the momentum or increasing the wavelength, the flash becomes a big fuzzy when a light was scattered from electron, and it’s hard to distinguish from which slit the flash is coming. Therefore, this experiment concludes that if we try to decrease, without disturbing the outcome, Δp (or increase Δλ) then, Δx increases, and vice-versa. So, it’s hard to build such an apparatus which can locate the electron without disturbing the result. It was Heisenberg who suggested there should be some limitation to make the laws consistent. Since quantum mechanics is such a successful theory in explaining many phenomena like Gravitational Waves, we need uncertainty principle to comprehend quantum behavior of atomic and sub-atomic particles.

We Are Not Sub-Atomic Particles!

Heisenberg’s Uncertainty Principle applies to every particle but it can’t be observed on a macroscopic level because λ is very large. In the TV scripted series, Genius, Albert Einstein, and Niels Bohr were talking to each other about the proof of Quantum Mechanics while walking. There was a moment when they were crossing the road and Einstein intentionally threw himself toward a car but Bohr pulled him back before the car hit him. When Bohr asked him to be more careful from the next time, Albert smiled hysterically and said, “Why should I? Why should either of us? According to you if that automobile was a particle but we didn't see it, it wouldn't have been there at all. We would be perfectly safe". To his defense, Bohr replied, “That principle is applied only to sub-atomic particles and automobiles are not sub-atomic particles”. In conclusion, Heisenberg’s Uncertainty Principle might save the perilous existence of Quantum Mechanics in the future but it won’t save you from the car so, be careful!

The Uncertainty Principle | Genius

Questions & Answers

    © 2018 Dishant Varshney

    Comments

      0 of 8192 characters used
      Post Comment

      • Dishant Varshney profile imageAUTHOR

        Dishant Varshney 

        5 months ago from Lucknow, India

        Wait! Dude! First, I am not a physicist, and forget about 'first rate'.

        Thanks for the feedback. I will keep the points in mind. And why I didn't talk about the future of QM? If I did then, it would make my article lengthier, and also it would become tedious. Quantum Internet, for example, is a big topic in itself, and it takes more skeptical concepts to explain of QM before writing something on Quantum Internet.

      • profile image

        Credence2 

        5 months ago

        You are obviously a phycisist of first rate. I, being a mere historian, have been interested in the concept of quantum mechanics and have heard the term frequently in scientific circles. I am ashamed to say that your knowledge and explanation of the subject still goes over my head. For one whose specialty is in the humanities, you will need to simplify your explanations a notch or two for us laymen.

        Also what would a more complete understanding of Quantum Mechanics have on technology? In other words, because of the invention of the vacuum tube, the era electronics was born. What marvelous devices or enhanced technological understanding can improve life for us all in the near future?

      working

      This website uses cookies

      As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, owlcation.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

      For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: https://owlcation.com/privacy-policy#gdpr

      Show Details
      Necessary
      HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
      LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
      Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
      AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
      HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
      HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
      Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
      CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
      Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
      Features
      Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
      Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
      Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
      Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
      Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
      VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
      PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
      Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
      MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
      Marketing
      Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
      Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
      Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
      SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
      Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
      Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
      AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
      OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
      Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
      TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
      Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
      Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
      Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
      Statistics
      Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
      ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
      Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)